Table of Contents
Fetching ...

FxSearcher: gradient-free text-driven audio transformation

Hojoon Ki, Jongsuk Kim, Minchan Kwon, Junmo Kim

TL;DR

FxSearcher tackles text-driven audio transformation with a gradient-free approach that searches over an audio FX chain using Bayesian optimization guided by a CLAP-based objective. The key idea is to maximize $S_{final} = S_{target} - S_{guide}$, where $S_{target}$ and $S_{guide}$ measure semantic alignment to the target description and to undesirable artifacts, respectively. By applying a six-FX chain and leveraging a guiding prompt, the method achieves high human and AI-aligned quality while supporting any differentiable or non-differentiable FX plugin, enabling broad sonic diversity. The results indicate strong perceptual relevance and robust performance across speech and instrumental domains, suggesting practical impact for accessible, high-quality, text-driven audio editing.

Abstract

Achieving diverse and high-quality audio transformations from text prompts remains challenging, as existing methods are fundamentally constrained by their reliance on a limited set of differentiable audio effects. This paper proposes FxSearcher, a novel gradient-free framework that discovers the optimal configuration of audio effects (FX) to transform a source signal according to a text prompt. Our method employs Bayesian Optimization and CLAP-based score function to perform this search efficiently. Furthermore, a guiding prompt is introduced to prevent undesirable artifacts and enhance human preference. To objectively evaluate our method, we propose an AI-based evaluation framework. The results demonstrate that the highest scores achieved by our method on these metrics align closely with human preferences. Demos are available at https://hojoonki.github.io/FxSearcher/

FxSearcher: gradient-free text-driven audio transformation

TL;DR

FxSearcher tackles text-driven audio transformation with a gradient-free approach that searches over an audio FX chain using Bayesian optimization guided by a CLAP-based objective. The key idea is to maximize , where and measure semantic alignment to the target description and to undesirable artifacts, respectively. By applying a six-FX chain and leveraging a guiding prompt, the method achieves high human and AI-aligned quality while supporting any differentiable or non-differentiable FX plugin, enabling broad sonic diversity. The results indicate strong perceptual relevance and robust performance across speech and instrumental domains, suggesting practical impact for accessible, high-quality, text-driven audio editing.

Abstract

Achieving diverse and high-quality audio transformations from text prompts remains challenging, as existing methods are fundamentally constrained by their reliance on a limited set of differentiable audio effects. This paper proposes FxSearcher, a novel gradient-free framework that discovers the optimal configuration of audio effects (FX) to transform a source signal according to a text prompt. Our method employs Bayesian Optimization and CLAP-based score function to perform this search efficiently. Furthermore, a guiding prompt is introduced to prevent undesirable artifacts and enhance human preference. To objectively evaluate our method, we propose an AI-based evaluation framework. The results demonstrate that the highest scores achieved by our method on these metrics align closely with human preferences. Demos are available at https://hojoonki.github.io/FxSearcher/

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 5 equations, 4 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Comparison of operational mechanisms between other FX parameter generation models and our method, FxSearcher.
  • Figure 2: Overview of the proposed pipeline. The framework takes a source audio and a target prompt as input, generating a transformed audio and its corresponding optimal parameter set via an iterative optimization process.
  • Figure 3: Illustration of the two AI-based evaluation methods. Left: Qwen providing a 1-5 absolute rating for a single audio based on a prompt. Right: Gemini performing a pairwise A/B comparison to choose the better of two audio.
  • Figure 4: Effect of the guiding prompt on loudness distribution. The plot (left) shows the density of loudness values (in LUFS), while the table (right) summarizes their mean and standard deviation.