Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Distribution and Maximal Behavior of $L(1, χ_D)$ over Hyperelliptic Curves

Pranendu Darbar

TL;DR

The paper studies the tail distribution and maximal size of $L(1, \chi_D)$ as $D$ ranges over the hyperelliptic ensemble in function fields, establishing an extended uniformity range for the tail decay. It combines two core approaches: (i) computing high moments of a truncated Euler product and applying a saddle-point analysis to obtener a double-exponential decay bound, and (ii) the long resonator method to push lower bounds toward the conjectured maximal scale, aided by refined character-sum estimates. The main results show that the tail decays doubly exponentially up to a nearly conjectural regime, with explicit constants and an unconditional bound that approaches the heuristic picture; moreover, the resonance method yields a positive shift $C_2(q)>0$ for large $q$, refining the maximal order of $L(1, \chi_D)$. These findings connect the distribution of $L$-values to class-number-type invariants $h_D$ and regulators, offering evidence toward the expected maximal order $\log n + \log_2 n + O(1)$ and providing tools potentially adaptable to broader $GL(1)$ families in function fields.

Abstract

We improve the range of uniformity in the double-exponential decay of the tail of the distribution established by Lumley~\cite{Lumley} for the quadratic Dirichlet $L$-function $L(1, χ_D)$ over the ensemble of hyperelliptic curves of genus~$g$ defined over a fixed finite field~$\mathbb{F}_q$, in the limit as $g \to \infty$. Furthermore, we apply a long resonator method to show that this range of uniformity may persist up to its conjectural level by establishing a double-exponential decay lower bound for the corresponding distribution function.

On the Distribution and Maximal Behavior of $L(1, χ_D)$ over Hyperelliptic Curves

TL;DR

The paper studies the tail distribution and maximal size of as ranges over the hyperelliptic ensemble in function fields, establishing an extended uniformity range for the tail decay. It combines two core approaches: (i) computing high moments of a truncated Euler product and applying a saddle-point analysis to obtener a double-exponential decay bound, and (ii) the long resonator method to push lower bounds toward the conjectured maximal scale, aided by refined character-sum estimates. The main results show that the tail decays doubly exponentially up to a nearly conjectural regime, with explicit constants and an unconditional bound that approaches the heuristic picture; moreover, the resonance method yields a positive shift for large , refining the maximal order of . These findings connect the distribution of -values to class-number-type invariants and regulators, offering evidence toward the expected maximal order and providing tools potentially adaptable to broader families in function fields.

Abstract

We improve the range of uniformity in the double-exponential decay of the tail of the distribution established by Lumley~\cite{Lumley} for the quadratic Dirichlet -function over the ensemble of hyperelliptic curves of genus~ defined over a fixed finite field~, in the limit as . Furthermore, we apply a long resonator method to show that this range of uniformity may persist up to its conjectural level by establishing a double-exponential decay lower bound for the corresponding distribution function.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 5 theorems, 130 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $q \ge 3$ be fixed. Uniformly for $\tau \le \log n + \log_2 n - \theta(n),$ where $2\leq \theta(n)\ll \log_3 n$ is any function tending arbitrarily slowly to infinity as $n \to \infty$, we have where the constants $C_0\!\left(q^{\{\log \kappa(\tau)\}}\right)$ and $C_1\!\left(q^{\{\log \kappa(\tau)\}}\right)$ depend on $\tau$, $q$, and $\kappa(\tau)$, yet remain bounded as the argument varies

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Lemma 1
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['main theorem']}
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['theorem on resonance method']}