Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Upper bounds on gaps between zeros of $L$-functions

Tianyu Zhao

TL;DR

This work establishes two unconditional bounds on gaps between consecutive non-trivial zeros of a broad class of $L$-functions by extending the Hall–Hayman and Siegel approaches to general $L$-functions with degree $m$ and analytic conductor $C_L(T)$. The Hall–Hayman-type result yields a zero near height $T$ with $| ildeeta-T| eq0$ bounded by a function of $ rac{ log rac{ log C_L(T)}{ log(m+2)}}{ logigl( rac{ log C_L(T)}{ log(m+2)}igr)- logigl( logigl( rac{ log C_L(T)}{ log(m+2)}igr)igr)}$, while the Siegel-type bound gives a complementary estimate in terms of $ logigl( logigl(C_L(T)^{1/m}igr)igr)$. The work shows each method dominates in different asymptotic regimes and yields concrete corollaries for Dirichlet and Dedekind zeta-functions, including uniform gap results via root discriminants. The combination of explicit analytic bounds (via a Rademacher-Phragmén–Lindelöf framework) and hyperbolic-geometry techniques provides unconditional control over zero spacings in a broad $L$-function setting, with the constants depending on the degree $m$ and the bound $ heta$ in the Euler factors.

Abstract

We prove two unconditional upper bounds on the gaps between ordinates of consecutive non-trivial zeros of a general $L$-function $L(s)$. This extends previous work of Hall and Hayman (2000) on the Riemann zeta-function and work of Siegel (1945) on Dirichlet $L$-functions. Interestingly, we observe that while Hall and Hayman's method gives a sharper estimate when the degree of $L(s)$ is sufficiently small compared to the analytic conductor, Siegel's method does better in the other regime.

Upper bounds on gaps between zeros of $L$-functions

TL;DR

This work establishes two unconditional bounds on gaps between consecutive non-trivial zeros of a broad class of -functions by extending the Hall–Hayman and Siegel approaches to general -functions with degree and analytic conductor . The Hall–Hayman-type result yields a zero near height with bounded by a function of , while the Siegel-type bound gives a complementary estimate in terms of . The work shows each method dominates in different asymptotic regimes and yields concrete corollaries for Dirichlet and Dedekind zeta-functions, including uniform gap results via root discriminants. The combination of explicit analytic bounds (via a Rademacher-Phragmén–Lindelöf framework) and hyperbolic-geometry techniques provides unconditional control over zero spacings in a broad -function setting, with the constants depending on the degree and the bound in the Euler factors.

Abstract

We prove two unconditional upper bounds on the gaps between ordinates of consecutive non-trivial zeros of a general -function . This extends previous work of Hall and Hayman (2000) on the Riemann zeta-function and work of Siegel (1945) on Dirichlet -functions. Interestingly, we observe that while Hall and Hayman's method gives a sharper estimate when the degree of is sufficiently small compared to the analytic conductor, Siegel's method does better in the other regime.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 11 theorems, 122 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

When $\frac{\log\log C_L(T)}{\log(m+2)}$ is sufficiently large, $L(s)$ possesses a non-trivial zero $\rho=\beta+i\gamma$ with

Theorems & Definitions (20)

  • Theorem 1
  • Remark 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Corollary 1
  • proof : Proof of Corollary \ref{['corollary']}
  • Lemma 3: Rad59
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Lemma 5: HH00
  • Lemma 6: HH00
  • ...and 10 more