Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Sharp threshold for universality of cokernels of random matrices over finite fields

Jungin Lee

TL;DR

The paper resolves a sharp universality threshold for cokernels of random matrices over finite fields, showing that for any fixed $c>1$ and $\alpha_n=\frac{c\log n}{n}$, the cokernel of an $n\times n$ matrix with $\alpha_n$-balanced entries in $\mathbb{F}_p$ converges in distribution to the same universal law as uniform random matrices, independent of the detailed entry distribution. The approach hinges on reducing the problem to extreme-point distributions, encoding cokernel moments via a Fourier-analytic framework with functions $f_{p,r}$ and $F_{p,r}$, and proving $F(t)\to 0$ by a meticulous decomposition of index ranges and casework (Cases C1–C3). The argument combines discrete Fourier analysis, combinatorial counting, and entropy-type estimates to bound contributions from all regimes, including large $i,j$ and structured subspace configurations, ultimately establishing near-optimal universality at the conjectured threshold. This result closes Woo22’s finite-field question and advances the broader universality program for cokernels of random $p$-adic and finite-field matrices, with implications for random Abelian $p$-groups and related combinatorial-probabilistic structures.

Abstract

In this paper, we determine the sharp threshold for universality of cokernels of random matrices over finite fields. More precisely, we prove the following: given any constant $c>1$, let $A(n)$ be a random $n \times n$ matrix over $\mathbb{F}_p$ whose entries are independent and take any given value of $\mathbb{F}_p$ with probability at most $1 - \frac{c \log n}{n}$. Then the cokernels of $A(n)$ converge in distribution, as $n \to \infty$, to the same limiting law as the cokernels of uniform random $n \times n$ matrices over $\mathbb{F}_p$. This answers an open problem posed by Wood (2022).

Sharp threshold for universality of cokernels of random matrices over finite fields

TL;DR

The paper resolves a sharp universality threshold for cokernels of random matrices over finite fields, showing that for any fixed and , the cokernel of an matrix with -balanced entries in converges in distribution to the same universal law as uniform random matrices, independent of the detailed entry distribution. The approach hinges on reducing the problem to extreme-point distributions, encoding cokernel moments via a Fourier-analytic framework with functions and , and proving by a meticulous decomposition of index ranges and casework (Cases C1–C3). The argument combines discrete Fourier analysis, combinatorial counting, and entropy-type estimates to bound contributions from all regimes, including large and structured subspace configurations, ultimately establishing near-optimal universality at the conjectured threshold. This result closes Woo22’s finite-field question and advances the broader universality program for cokernels of random -adic and finite-field matrices, with implications for random Abelian -groups and related combinatorial-probabilistic structures.

Abstract

In this paper, we determine the sharp threshold for universality of cokernels of random matrices over finite fields. More precisely, we prove the following: given any constant , let be a random matrix over whose entries are independent and take any given value of with probability at most . Then the cokernels of converge in distribution, as , to the same limiting law as the cokernels of uniform random matrices over . This answers an open problem posed by Wood (2022).

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 14 theorems, 98 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

(NW22) Let $(\alpha_n)_{n \ge 1}$ be a sequence of positive real numbers such that for every constant $\Delta > 0$, we have $\alpha_n \geq \frac{\Delta \log n}{n}$ for all sufficiently large $n$. Let $A(n)$ be an $\alpha_n$-balanced random matrix in $\mathrm{M}_n(\mathbb{Z}_p)$ for each $n \ge 1$. T

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • ...and 13 more