Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Diamonds on trees

Osvaldo Guzmán, Carlos López-Callejas

TL;DR

This work generalizes Jensen’s diamond to ω1-trees via Brodsky’s tree-stationarity, introducing the tree- diamond principles $\diamondsuit_T$ and $\diamondsuit_T^*$. It establishes tight connections to the classical diamond: $\diamondsuit_T$ implies $\diamondsuit$ for nonspecial trees, and in almost-Suslin trees $\diamondsuit_T$ is equivalent to $\diamondsuit$; it also shows $\diamondsuit^*$ implies $\diamondsuit_T$ under broad conditions. The authors construct forcing models to separate these principles, proving that $\diamondsuit^*$ can fail while $\diamondsuit_T$ holds for all nonspecial Aronszajn trees, and that $\diamondsuit$ can hold while some tree $T$ violates $\diamondsuit_T$, thereby illustrating a nuanced landscape of tree-based diamonds. They further show that $\diamondsuit_T$ can be strictly stronger than $\diamondsuit$ in general and pose several open questions about successor partitions, ladder-system forcings, and extensions to larger cardinals. Overall, the paper develops a framework in which tree-based diamond principles serve as invariants for analyzing the structure of nonspecial ω1-trees and their forcing-independence properties.

Abstract

We generalize the diamond principle and its variants using the notion of stationarity in trees introduced by Brodsky in [Brodsky, A. M., A theory of stationary trees and the balanced Baumgartner--Hajnal--Todorcevic theorem for trees. \emph{The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic}]. In particular, we show that if $T$ is a nonspecial $ω_1$-tree, then $\diamondsuit_T \implies \diamondsuit$, and if $T$ is a Suslin tree, then $\diamondsuit_T \iff \diamondsuit$. We also prove that $\diamondsuit^*$ implies $\diamondsuit_T$ (yielding the consistency of $\diamondsuit_T$) and establish the consistency of $\neg\diamondsuit^* + (\forall T\text{ nonspecial }ω_1\text{-tree }(\diamondsuit_T))$. Finally, we demonstrate that it is consistent with $\diamondsuit$ that there exists a nonspecial $ω_1$-tree with $(\neg\diamondsuit_T)$, introducing two forcing properties -- $σ(S)$-closed and strategically closed in models -- which are preserved under countable support iterations.

Diamonds on trees

TL;DR

This work generalizes Jensen’s diamond to ω1-trees via Brodsky’s tree-stationarity, introducing the tree- diamond principles and . It establishes tight connections to the classical diamond: implies for nonspecial trees, and in almost-Suslin trees is equivalent to ; it also shows implies under broad conditions. The authors construct forcing models to separate these principles, proving that can fail while holds for all nonspecial Aronszajn trees, and that can hold while some tree violates , thereby illustrating a nuanced landscape of tree-based diamonds. They further show that can be strictly stronger than in general and pose several open questions about successor partitions, ladder-system forcings, and extensions to larger cardinals. Overall, the paper develops a framework in which tree-based diamond principles serve as invariants for analyzing the structure of nonspecial ω1-trees and their forcing-independence properties.

Abstract

We generalize the diamond principle and its variants using the notion of stationarity in trees introduced by Brodsky in [Brodsky, A. M., A theory of stationary trees and the balanced Baumgartner--Hajnal--Todorcevic theorem for trees. \emph{The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic}]. In particular, we show that if is a nonspecial -tree, then , and if is a Suslin tree, then . We also prove that implies (yielding the consistency of ) and establish the consistency of . Finally, we demonstrate that it is consistent with that there exists a nonspecial -tree with , introducing two forcing properties -- -closed and strategically closed in models -- which are preserved under countable support iterations.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 50 theorems, 108 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.12

Let $T$ be a tree of height $\omega_1$. Then:

Theorems & Definitions (127)

  • Definition 2.1: jensen
  • Definition 2.2: jensennotes
  • Definition 2.3: jensennotes
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • Definition 2.10
  • Remark 2.11
  • ...and 117 more