Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Advancing the Rödl Nibble: New bounds on matchings and the list chromatic index of hypergraphs

Stephen Gould, Tom Kelly

TL;DR

This work advances the Rödl nibble framework for hypergraph matchings by exhaustively exploiting the full codegree sequence up to natural bottlenecks, enabling near-perfect coverings with subpolynomial errors. It introduces a robust pseudorandom matching paradigm via a family of weight functions, yielding applications to list colorings and to a spectrum of combinatorial structures including Latin squares, Steiner systems, and simplicial complexes. The core methodology combines a two-stage Nibble/Chomp process with concentration tools (including Linear Talagrand with exceptional outcomes and Kim–Vu polynomial concentration) and absorption-inspired reservoir techniques to convert almost-matchings into near-perfect or perfect ones in complex, multipartite settings. The results yield improved bounds on the list chromatic index, as well as near-optimal leftovers for diverse combinatorial objects, highlighting the practical impact of nibble-based approaches in design theory, Latin squares, and higher-dimensional combinatorial constructions.

Abstract

Let $H$ be a $(k+1)$-uniform hypergraph which is nearly $D$-regular, such that any set of $i$ vertices is contained in at most $D_i$ edges of $H$ for each $i = 2, 3, \dots, k+1$. Influential results of Pippenger and of Frankl and Rödl show that the \textit{Rödl Nibble} -- a probabilistic procedure which iteratively constructs a matching in small bits -- can produce an almost-perfect matching in $H$, provided $D_2$ is much smaller than $D$. The quantitative aspects of this result were sharpened by several authors, with the previously best-known result due to Vu, whose result takes more of the codegree sequence $D_2, \dots, D_{k+1}$ into account. We improve Vu's result, by showing the Rödl Nibble can ``exhaust'' the full codegree sequence up to one of several natural bottlenecks, even tolerating extensive ``clustering'' of codegree values. Up to a subpolynomial error term, we believe our result to be the optimal usage of pure nibble methodology. We also show that our matching can be taken to be ``pseudorandom'' with respect to a set of weight functions on $V(H)$, and we use this result to derive other hypergraph matching results in partite settings, including a new bound on the list chromatic index which implies the best-known result of Molloy and Reed up to the error term, and is stronger when the hypergraph is not close to linear, i.e.\ $D_2=ω(1)$. We also apply our results to obtain improved bounds on almost-spanning structures in Latin squares and designs, and the maximum diameter of a simplicial complex.

Advancing the Rödl Nibble: New bounds on matchings and the list chromatic index of hypergraphs

TL;DR

This work advances the Rödl nibble framework for hypergraph matchings by exhaustively exploiting the full codegree sequence up to natural bottlenecks, enabling near-perfect coverings with subpolynomial errors. It introduces a robust pseudorandom matching paradigm via a family of weight functions, yielding applications to list colorings and to a spectrum of combinatorial structures including Latin squares, Steiner systems, and simplicial complexes. The core methodology combines a two-stage Nibble/Chomp process with concentration tools (including Linear Talagrand with exceptional outcomes and Kim–Vu polynomial concentration) and absorption-inspired reservoir techniques to convert almost-matchings into near-perfect or perfect ones in complex, multipartite settings. The results yield improved bounds on the list chromatic index, as well as near-optimal leftovers for diverse combinatorial objects, highlighting the practical impact of nibble-based approaches in design theory, Latin squares, and higher-dimensional combinatorial constructions.

Abstract

Let be a -uniform hypergraph which is nearly -regular, such that any set of vertices is contained in at most edges of for each . Influential results of Pippenger and of Frankl and Rödl show that the \textit{Rödl Nibble} -- a probabilistic procedure which iteratively constructs a matching in small bits -- can produce an almost-perfect matching in , provided is much smaller than . The quantitative aspects of this result were sharpened by several authors, with the previously best-known result due to Vu, whose result takes more of the codegree sequence into account. We improve Vu's result, by showing the Rödl Nibble can ``exhaust'' the full codegree sequence up to one of several natural bottlenecks, even tolerating extensive ``clustering'' of codegree values. Up to a subpolynomial error term, we believe our result to be the optimal usage of pure nibble methodology. We also show that our matching can be taken to be ``pseudorandom'' with respect to a set of weight functions on , and we use this result to derive other hypergraph matching results in partite settings, including a new bound on the list chromatic index which implies the best-known result of Molloy and Reed up to the error term, and is stronger when the hypergraph is not close to linear, i.e.\ . We also apply our results to obtain improved bounds on almost-spanning structures in Latin squares and designs, and the maximum diameter of a simplicial complex.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 29 sections, 34 theorems, 110 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose that $1/D\ll1/K,1/k,\delta,\gamma<1$. Let $H$ be a $(k+1)$-uniform, $(n,D,{\varepsilon})$-regular hypergraph with $C_2(H)\leq D_2\leq D^{1-\gamma}$ and ${\varepsilon}\leq K\sqrt{\log D/D}$. Then there is a matching $M$ of $H$ which covers all but at most $n(D/D_2)^{-1/k +\delta}$ vertices.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: An illustration of semi-stuck, super-stuck, and slowpoke indices, and clustering of the degree sequence.

Theorems & Definitions (54)

  • Theorem 1.1: Kostochka and Rödl KR97, 1997
  • Theorem 1.2: Vu V00, 2000
  • Theorem 1.3: Kang, Kühn, Methuku, and Osthus KKMO23, 2023
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6: Bipartite Matching Theorem
  • Theorem 1.7
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.8: Kang, Kühn, Methuku, and Osthus KKMO23
  • Theorem 1.9: Molloy and Reed MR00
  • ...and 44 more