Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Estimating spectral radius of Bell-type operator via finite dimensional approximation of orthogonal projections

Yuki Fujii, Toyohiro Tsurumaru

TL;DR

This work addresses the problem of estimating the spectral radius rho([A,B]) for two orthogonal projections by connecting it to the Bell-CHSH operator in quantum information theory. It develops a finite dimensional approximation framework for projections, extends Jordan's lemma via a one-shifted form, and derives upper and lower bounds for rho([A,B]) from eigenvalues of finite dimensional approximants, achieving exact results in constant-angle one-shifted cases. A key contribution is a new Tsirelson-type inequality proof obtained through reduction to finite dimensions, plus explicit constructions enabling practical computations. The results provide a principled method to bound Bell-CHSH operator spectra in infinite dimensional settings, with potential impact on device-independent quantum information tasks and related spectral problems in quantum mechanics.

Abstract

In quantum mechanics, the following problem is important: For two orthogonal projections P and Q on a separable infinite dimensional Hilbert space V, estimate the spectral radius of the commutator [A,B], where A=2P-I, B=2Q-I. This problem is known to be equivalent to determining the spectral radius of the Bell-CHSH operator. To approach this problem, we give a method to approximate orthogonal projections on V by those on finite dimensional subspaces. This method provides an upper bound and a lower bound for the spectral radius of [A,B], which become exact when the matrix representations of P and Q are "constant-angle one-shifted form".

Estimating spectral radius of Bell-type operator via finite dimensional approximation of orthogonal projections

TL;DR

This work addresses the problem of estimating the spectral radius rho([A,B]) for two orthogonal projections by connecting it to the Bell-CHSH operator in quantum information theory. It develops a finite dimensional approximation framework for projections, extends Jordan's lemma via a one-shifted form, and derives upper and lower bounds for rho([A,B]) from eigenvalues of finite dimensional approximants, achieving exact results in constant-angle one-shifted cases. A key contribution is a new Tsirelson-type inequality proof obtained through reduction to finite dimensions, plus explicit constructions enabling practical computations. The results provide a principled method to bound Bell-CHSH operator spectra in infinite dimensional settings, with potential impact on device-independent quantum information tasks and related spectral problems in quantum mechanics.

Abstract

In quantum mechanics, the following problem is important: For two orthogonal projections P and Q on a separable infinite dimensional Hilbert space V, estimate the spectral radius of the commutator [A,B], where A=2P-I, B=2Q-I. This problem is known to be equivalent to determining the spectral radius of the Bell-CHSH operator. To approach this problem, we give a method to approximate orthogonal projections on V by those on finite dimensional subspaces. This method provides an upper bound and a lower bound for the spectral radius of [A,B], which become exact when the matrix representations of P and Q are "constant-angle one-shifted form".

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 sections, 18 theorems, 94 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

There exists an orthonormal basis $\mathcal{U} = \{u_i\}_{i=1}^\infty$ and a pair of sequences $\Theta = \{\theta_i\}_{i=1}^\infty, \Omega = \{\omega_i\}_{i=1}^\infty \subset (0,\pi)$ such that, for any vector $v \in V$, where $\pi_n$ is the orthogonal projection onto the finite dimensional subspace $V_n$ spanned by $\{u_1, \dots, u_{2n}\}$, and $P_n(\Theta)$, $Q_n(\Omega)$ are orthogonal project

Theorems & Definitions (56)

  • Theorem 1: Approximation of one-shifted form
  • Theorem 2
  • proof : Proof of (i)
  • proof : Proof of (ii)
  • proof : Proof of (iii)
  • Theorem 1.4: Tsirelson's inequality BSTsirelson1980
  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • ...and 46 more