Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Where is the Entropy in DSSYK-de Sitter? Correction to a wrong claim

Leonard Susskind

TL;DR

The paper addresses where entropy resides in the holographic description of the de Sitter static patch, correcting a prior claim that it sits at a string-distance from the horizon. It clarifies notational conventions by identifying $\lambda = g_{open}^2$ and lays out the scale relations among $M_{min}$, $M_{micro}$, $M_{Planck}$, and $M_{string}$, highlighting the open-string nature of the ${\rm tHooft}$ model. The main result is that the stretched horizon is located at a Planck-scale distance, with the confinement-deconfinement transition at $T_c = \Lambda \sqrt{N}$ leading to $\rho_{sh} = T_c^{-1} = g_{open}^{-1} \ell_{planck}$ and $T_c = g_{open} M_{planck}$; this aligns with Planck-scale physics rather than string-scale intuition. A comparison with higher-dimensional string theory shows that, while closed-string theories exhibit a Hagedorn transition at $T_c = M_{string}$, the open-string-only setting yields the Planck-scale horizon entropy, reinforcing the central role of Planck-scale phenomena in the DSSYK/JT-de Sitter holographic correspondence.

Abstract

A question arises in the holographic description of the static patch of de Sitter space: Where does the entropy reside? The answer of course is in the stretched horizon, but how far from the mathematical horizon is the stretched horizon? In recent papers and lectures I argued that the entropy in DSSYK/JT-de Sitter resides at a string distance from the horizon. That conclusion was based on misconception about the confinement-deconfinement transition in the 't Hooft model. When corrected the right answer is of order the Planck distance (which differs from the string distance by a factor of order $\sqrt{N}).$

Where is the Entropy in DSSYK-de Sitter? Correction to a wrong claim

TL;DR

The paper addresses where entropy resides in the holographic description of the de Sitter static patch, correcting a prior claim that it sits at a string-distance from the horizon. It clarifies notational conventions by identifying and lays out the scale relations among , , , and , highlighting the open-string nature of the model. The main result is that the stretched horizon is located at a Planck-scale distance, with the confinement-deconfinement transition at leading to and ; this aligns with Planck-scale physics rather than string-scale intuition. A comparison with higher-dimensional string theory shows that, while closed-string theories exhibit a Hagedorn transition at , the open-string-only setting yields the Planck-scale horizon entropy, reinforcing the central role of Planck-scale phenomena in the DSSYK/JT-de Sitter holographic correspondence.

Abstract

A question arises in the holographic description of the static patch of de Sitter space: Where does the entropy reside? The answer of course is in the stretched horizon, but how far from the mathematical horizon is the stretched horizon? In recent papers and lectures I argued that the entropy in DSSYK/JT-de Sitter resides at a string distance from the horizon. That conclusion was based on misconception about the confinement-deconfinement transition in the 't Hooft model. When corrected the right answer is of order the Planck distance (which differs from the string distance by a factor of order

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 14 equations, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Energy scales shown from the lowest $M_{min},$
  • Figure 2: Rindler space divided into hot and cold regions by a curve along which the temperature is the QCD-scale. The distance of the dividing curve from the horizon is the string length. The mistake was to identify the curve with the phase boundary separating the cold confined region from the hot plasma deconfined region.