Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Vertex-transitive graphs with uniformly bisecting quasi-geodesics

Joseph MacManus

TL;DR

This work proves that an infinite, locally finite, quasi-transitive graph X satisfying a uniformly bisecting quasi-geodesics property must be quasi-isometric to either the Euclidean plane $\mathbb{R}^2$ or the hyperbolic plane $\mathbb{H}^2$. The argument splits into non-hyperbolic and hyperbolic cases: non-hyperbolic leads to quadratic growth via Varopoulos-type isoperimetric controls and Trofimov–Bass–Guivarc'h machinery, yielding a virtual $\mathbb{Z}^2$-type structure and Euclidean rigidity; hyperbolic yields a circle boundary and, by the convergence group theorem, virtual Fuchsianity corresponding to $\mathbb{H}^2$. In particular, for Cayley graphs, the underlying group is a virtual surface group, providing a geometric characterization that extends known results about hyperbolic groups with circular boundary. The paper also resolves Kourov notebook Problem 14.98 in the affirmative and develops a suite of geometric tools—witnesses, cross-examiners, and jurisdiction criteria—that link coarse separation properties to large-scale growth and rigidity.

Abstract

Suppose that $X$ is an infinite, connected, locally finite, quasi-transitive graph with the property that every bi-infinite quasi-geodesic uniformly coarsely separates $X$ into exactly two deep pieces. We show that such an $X$ is quasi-isometric to either the Euclidean plane or the hyperbolic plane. In particular, if $X$ is a Cayley graph of a finitely generated group $G$ with the above property, then $G$ is a virtual surface group. This can be interpreted as an extension of the well-known fact that a hyperbolic group with circular boundary is virtually Fuchsian. Our theorem positively resolves Problem 14.98 of the Kourovka Notebook, posed by V. A. Churkin in 1999. The proof uses an isoperimetric inequality of Varopoulos to show that if such a graph has the above property, then either it is hyperbolic or has quadratic growth.

Vertex-transitive graphs with uniformly bisecting quasi-geodesics

TL;DR

This work proves that an infinite, locally finite, quasi-transitive graph X satisfying a uniformly bisecting quasi-geodesics property must be quasi-isometric to either the Euclidean plane or the hyperbolic plane . The argument splits into non-hyperbolic and hyperbolic cases: non-hyperbolic leads to quadratic growth via Varopoulos-type isoperimetric controls and Trofimov–Bass–Guivarc'h machinery, yielding a virtual -type structure and Euclidean rigidity; hyperbolic yields a circle boundary and, by the convergence group theorem, virtual Fuchsianity corresponding to . In particular, for Cayley graphs, the underlying group is a virtual surface group, providing a geometric characterization that extends known results about hyperbolic groups with circular boundary. The paper also resolves Kourov notebook Problem 14.98 in the affirmative and develops a suite of geometric tools—witnesses, cross-examiners, and jurisdiction criteria—that link coarse separation properties to large-scale growth and rigidity.

Abstract

Suppose that is an infinite, connected, locally finite, quasi-transitive graph with the property that every bi-infinite quasi-geodesic uniformly coarsely separates into exactly two deep pieces. We show that such an is quasi-isometric to either the Euclidean plane or the hyperbolic plane. In particular, if is a Cayley graph of a finitely generated group with the above property, then is a virtual surface group. This can be interpreted as an extension of the well-known fact that a hyperbolic group with circular boundary is virtually Fuchsian. Our theorem positively resolves Problem 14.98 of the Kourovka Notebook, posed by V. A. Churkin in 1999. The proof uses an isoperimetric inequality of Varopoulos to show that if such a graph has the above property, then either it is hyperbolic or has quadratic growth.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 19 theorems, 39 equations, 9 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $G$ be an infinite hyperbolic group with (eq:BQ). Then $G$ is virtually Fuchsian.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Cartoon of the proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:witness-intersects-q']}.
  • Figure 2:
  • Figure 3:
  • Figure 4: Cartoon of a cross-examiner.
  • Figure 5: The bad case.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (76)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem : Corollary of the convergence group theorem
  • Theorem 1
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Remark 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.4
  • proof
  • ...and 66 more