Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Characterization of the unit object in localized quantum unipotent category

Koh Matsuura, Toshiki Nakashima

TL;DR

The paper characterizes the unit object in the localized localized quantum unipotent category for classical finite types and provides an explicit formula for the dual crystal statistic ε_i^* on the cellular crystal associated to a longest word. Building on the crystal structure on Irr( ilde{R-gmod}[w]) and the cellular crystal We show Irr( ilde{R-gmod}[w]) ≅ 𝔅_{oldsymbol i} and derive concrete ε_i^* expressions in types A_n, B_n, C_n, and D_n, enabling a precise criterion wt(X)=0 and ε_i^*(X)=0 for all i to characterize the unit object. The approach leverages localization via graded braiders, the induced crystal structure on the localized category, and braid-move isomorphisms to translate combinatorial data into module-theoretic interpretations. This yields explicit computational tools for understanding the unit in localized categories and deepens the link between quiver Hecke algebras, crystals, and cellular crystals in the classical finite-type setting.

Abstract

For the quiver Hecke algebra $R$, let $R\hbox{-gmod}$ be the category of finite-dimensional graded $R$-modules, and let $\widetilde{R\hbox{-gmod}[w]}$ be the localization of $R\hbox{-gmod}$. Kashiwara and the second author showed the set of equivalence classes of simple objects up to grading shifts $\mathrm{Irr}(\widetilde{R\hbox{-gmod}[w]})$ in $\widetilde{R\hbox{-gmod}[w]}$ has a crystal structure, and $\mathrm{Irr}(\widetilde{R\hbox{-gmod}[w]})$ is isomorphic to the so-called cellular crystal $\mathbb B_{\mathbf i}$. This isomorphism induces a function $\varepsilon_i^*$ on $\mathbb B_{\mathbf i}$. We give an explicit formula of $\varepsilon_i^*$, and using this formula, we give a characterization of the unit object of $\widetilde{R\hbox{-gmod}[w]}$ for the case of classical finite types.

Characterization of the unit object in localized quantum unipotent category

TL;DR

The paper characterizes the unit object in the localized localized quantum unipotent category for classical finite types and provides an explicit formula for the dual crystal statistic ε_i^* on the cellular crystal associated to a longest word. Building on the crystal structure on Irr( ilde{R-gmod}[w]) and the cellular crystal We show Irr( ilde{R-gmod}[w]) ≅ 𝔅_{oldsymbol i} and derive concrete ε_i^* expressions in types A_n, B_n, C_n, and D_n, enabling a precise criterion wt(X)=0 and ε_i^*(X)=0 for all i to characterize the unit object. The approach leverages localization via graded braiders, the induced crystal structure on the localized category, and braid-move isomorphisms to translate combinatorial data into module-theoretic interpretations. This yields explicit computational tools for understanding the unit in localized categories and deepens the link between quiver Hecke algebras, crystals, and cellular crystals in the classical finite-type setting.

Abstract

For the quiver Hecke algebra , let be the category of finite-dimensional graded -modules, and let be the localization of . Kashiwara and the second author showed the set of equivalence classes of simple objects up to grading shifts in has a crystal structure, and is isomorphic to the so-called cellular crystal . This isomorphism induces a function on . We give an explicit formula of , and using this formula, we give a characterization of the unit object of for the case of classical finite types.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 sections, 12 theorems, 97 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.9

For $i\in I$, set $B_i=\{(z)_i\,|\,z\in \mathbb Z\}$ and let $A=(a_{ij})_{i,j \in I}$ be a Cartan matrix. Then, there exist the following isomorphisms of crystals $\phi_{ij}^{(k)}$ ($k=0,1,2,3$): We call these $\phi_{ij}^{(k)}$ ($k=0,1,2,3$) the braid-type isomorphisms of $B_i$'s. We omit $\phi_{ij}^{(3)}$ and $\phi_{ji}^{(3)}$, since we do not use in this article. Note that $\phi_{ij}^{(k)}$ a

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Example 2.4
  • Example 2.5: K1
  • Example 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • Proposition 2.9: N1
  • Definition 2.10
  • ...and 26 more