Table of Contents
Fetching ...

TSPE-GS: Probabilistic Depth Extraction for Semi-Transparent Surface Reconstruction via 3D Gaussian Splatting

Zhiyuan Xu, Nan Min, Yuhang Guo, Tong Wei

TL;DR

TSPE-GS addresses the failure of single-depth assumptions in 3D Gaussian Splatting when reconstructing semi-transparent scenes. By modeling per-pixel depth as a multi-modal distribution over sampled transmittances and extracting multiple surface depths via peak detection, it enables simultaneous outer and inner surface reconstruction. The method integrates these multi-layer depths through progressive TSDF fusion, preventing interference between layers. Experiments on semi-transparent and opaque datasets show significant gains in semi-transparent geometry without sacrificing opaque performance, and the approach remains a plug-and-play enhancement for Gaussian-based pipelines.

Abstract

3D Gaussian Splatting offers a strong speed-quality trade-off but struggles to reconstruct semi-transparent surfaces because most methods assume a single depth per pixel, which fails when multiple surfaces are visible. We propose TSPE-GS (Transparent Surface Probabilistic Extraction for Gaussian Splatting), which uniformly samples transmittance to model a pixel-wise multi-modal distribution of opacity and depth, replacing the prior single-peak assumption and resolving cross-surface depth ambiguity. By progressively fusing truncated signed distance functions, TSPE-GS reconstructs external and internal surfaces separately within a unified framework. The method generalizes to other Gaussian-based reconstruction pipelines without extra training overhead. Extensive experiments on public and self-collected semi-transparent and opaque datasets show TSPE-GS significantly improves semi-transparent geometry reconstruction while maintaining performance on opaque scenes.

TSPE-GS: Probabilistic Depth Extraction for Semi-Transparent Surface Reconstruction via 3D Gaussian Splatting

TL;DR

TSPE-GS addresses the failure of single-depth assumptions in 3D Gaussian Splatting when reconstructing semi-transparent scenes. By modeling per-pixel depth as a multi-modal distribution over sampled transmittances and extracting multiple surface depths via peak detection, it enables simultaneous outer and inner surface reconstruction. The method integrates these multi-layer depths through progressive TSDF fusion, preventing interference between layers. Experiments on semi-transparent and opaque datasets show significant gains in semi-transparent geometry without sacrificing opaque performance, and the approach remains a plug-and-play enhancement for Gaussian-based pipelines.

Abstract

3D Gaussian Splatting offers a strong speed-quality trade-off but struggles to reconstruct semi-transparent surfaces because most methods assume a single depth per pixel, which fails when multiple surfaces are visible. We propose TSPE-GS (Transparent Surface Probabilistic Extraction for Gaussian Splatting), which uniformly samples transmittance to model a pixel-wise multi-modal distribution of opacity and depth, replacing the prior single-peak assumption and resolving cross-surface depth ambiguity. By progressively fusing truncated signed distance functions, TSPE-GS reconstructs external and internal surfaces separately within a unified framework. The method generalizes to other Gaussian-based reconstruction pipelines without extra training overhead. Extensive experiments on public and self-collected semi-transparent and opaque datasets show TSPE-GS significantly improves semi-transparent geometry reconstruction while maintaining performance on opaque scenes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 34 sections, 17 equations, 13 figures, 4 tables, 2 algorithms.

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: Visual comparison of reconstruction on a semi-transparent object in $\alpha$Surf dataset with and without TSPE.
  • Figure 2: Depth PDF and CDF for opaque surfaces.
  • Figure 3: Depth PDF and CDF for semi-transparent surfaces.
  • Figure 4: Workflow of the TSPE-GS pipeline for multi-layer depth estimation and reconstruction.
  • Figure 5: We visually compare our method with other Gaussian-based geometry reconstruction pipelines to demonstrate the effectiveness.
  • ...and 8 more figures