Equivalence of Several 6G Modulation Schemes for Doubly-Selective Channels
Nishant Mehrotra, Sandesh Rao Mattu, Robert Calderbank
TL;DR
This work addresses modulation design for doubly-selective channels with large delay and Doppler spreads by introducing two core properties: non-selectivity, which ensures full delay-Doppler diversity, and predictability, which reduces pilot overhead. It analyzes five schemes—OFDM, AFDM, ODDM, OTSM, and Zak-OTFS—within a unified discrete-time model with frame size $BT$ and channel spreading function $\mathbf{h}[k,l]$, showing that OFDM is selective and non-predictable while AFDM, ODDM, OTSM, and Zak-OTFS are non-selective, predictable, and, under unitary mappings, equivalent. The paper proves a unitary equivalence among the latter four modulations (via pulsone-based constructions and GDAFT relations) and supports the theory with Vehicular-A channel simulations that indicate equal per-carrier energy and similar BER under perfect CSI, contrasted with OFDM’s degraded performance. The results offer a principled basis for choosing and reinterpreting multicarrier schemes in 6G scenarios, highlighting the practical impact of non-selectivity and predictability on spectral efficiency and detection performance. Key contributions include formalizing the non-selectivity/predictability framework, establishing equivalence among AFDM/ODDM/OTSM/Zak-OTFS, and demonstrating the approach’s validity through detailed numerical experiments.
Abstract
There is significant recent interest in designing new modulation schemes for doubly-selective channels with large delay and Doppler spreads, where legacy modulation schemes based on time-frequency signal representations do not perform well. In this paper, we develop a framework for analyzing such modulations using two characteristics -- non-selectivity and predictability -- which directly relate to the diversity and spectral efficiency that the modulations achieve. We show that modulations in the delay-Doppler, chirp and time-sequency domains are non-selective, predictable and equivalent to one another, whereas time-frequency modulations are selective and non-predictable.
