Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Concentrated sets and the Hurewicz property

Valentin Haberl, Piotr Szewczak, Lyubomyr Zdomskyy

TL;DR

This work investigates how the Hurewicz, Menger, and Rothberger covering properties interact with the structure of ${\mathfrak{b}}$-concentrated sets of reals, using semifilter methods to unify ZFC results with model-dependent phenomena. It introduces and exploits semifilters, ${S}$-scales, and notions like meager-unboundedness and bi-${\mathfrak{d}}$-unboundedness to characterize when products preserve Hurewicz and Menger properties. Under the semifilter trichotomy, every ${\mathfrak{b}}$-concentrated set becomes Hurewicz and productively Hurewicz, while the Laver model yields a distinct combinatorial picture, with Hurewicz equating to a $(\dagger)$-type property. The paper develops a broad, filter- and scale-based framework for productive versions of Menger-type properties, proving both positive and negative productivity results and posing extensive open questions for further exploration in set-theoretic topology. The results illuminate how set-theoretic hypotheses shape the landscape of productiveness for Hurewicz, Menger, and related properties in real-analytic spaces.

Abstract

A set of reals $X$ is $\mathfrak{b}$-concentrated if it has cardinality at least $\mathfrak{b}$ and it contains a countable set $D\subseteq X$ such that each closed subset of $X$ disjoint with $D$ has size smaller than $\mathfrak{b}$. We present ZFC results about structures of $\mathfrak{b}$-concentrated sets with the Hurewicz covering property using semifilters. Then we show that assuming that the semifilter trichotomy holds, then each $\mathfrak{b}$-concentrated set is Hurewicz and even productively Hurewicz. We also show that the appearance of Hurewicz $\mathfrak{b}$-concentrated sets under the semifilter trichotomy is somewhat specific and the situation in the Laver model for the consitency of the Borel Conjecture is different.

Concentrated sets and the Hurewicz property

TL;DR

This work investigates how the Hurewicz, Menger, and Rothberger covering properties interact with the structure of -concentrated sets of reals, using semifilter methods to unify ZFC results with model-dependent phenomena. It introduces and exploits semifilters, -scales, and notions like meager-unboundedness and bi--unboundedness to characterize when products preserve Hurewicz and Menger properties. Under the semifilter trichotomy, every -concentrated set becomes Hurewicz and productively Hurewicz, while the Laver model yields a distinct combinatorial picture, with Hurewicz equating to a -type property. The paper develops a broad, filter- and scale-based framework for productive versions of Menger-type properties, proving both positive and negative productivity results and posing extensive open questions for further exploration in set-theoretic topology. The results illuminate how set-theoretic hypotheses shape the landscape of productiveness for Hurewicz, Menger, and related properties in real-analytic spaces.

Abstract

A set of reals is -concentrated if it has cardinality at least and it contains a countable set such that each closed subset of disjoint with has size smaller than . We present ZFC results about structures of -concentrated sets with the Hurewicz covering property using semifilters. Then we show that assuming that the semifilter trichotomy holds, then each -concentrated set is Hurewicz and even productively Hurewicz. We also show that the appearance of Hurewicz -concentrated sets under the semifilter trichotomy is somewhat specific and the situation in the Laver model for the consitency of the Borel Conjecture is different.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 26 sections, 72 theorems, 149 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

A set of reals $X$ is Hurewicz (Menger, Rothberger) if and only if each continuous image of $X$ into ${\omega^{\omega}}$ is bounded (not dominating, guessable).

Figures (1)

  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (155)

  • Theorem 1.1: Recław reclaw
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3: Talagrand Talagrand
  • Lemma 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5: pMGen
  • Lemma 2.6: Just--Miller--Scheepers--Szeptycki coc2
  • Lemma 2.6: Just--Miller--Scheepers--Szeptycki coc2
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:meagerunbdd']}
  • ...and 145 more