Uncovering Scientific Software Sustainability through Community Engagement and Software Quality Metrics
Sharif Ahmed, Addi Malviya Thakur, Gregory R. Watson, Nasir U. Eisty
TL;DR
The paper addresses the challenge of sustaining scientific open-source software (Sci-OSS) by identifying two core drivers—community engagement and software quality—and mapping them to repository metrics drawn from GitHub data. It introduces the Software SusTainability Graph (STG), a multimodal visualization that consolidates 31 metrics across 18 leads and 46 components to display current and evolving sustainability signals for ten Sci-OSS projects. Through visual analysis, non-parametric statistics, and NLP-driven conversation analysis, the authors demonstrate that project-specific feedback and dynamics influence sustainability, with limited evidence for domain-wide patterns. The work provides a dataset, a compact visualization approach, and methodological foundations that researchers, funders, and developers can use to assess and support long-term Sci-OSS sustainability, and it outlines future work to broaden metric coverage and integrate these tools into practice.
Abstract
Scientific open-source software (Sci-OSS) projects are critical for advancing research, yet sustaining these projects long-term remains a major challenge. This paper explores the sustainability of Sci-OSS hosted on GitHub, focusing on two factors drawn from stewardship organizations: community engagement and software quality. We map sustainability to repository metrics from the literature and mined data from ten prominent Sci-OSS projects. A multimodal analysis of these projects led us to a novel visualization technique, providing a robust way to display both current and evolving software metrics over time, replacing multiple traditional visualizations with one. Additionally, our statistical analysis shows that even similar-domain projects sustain themselves differently. Natural language analysis supports claims from the literature, highlighting that project-specific feedback plays a key role in maintaining software quality. Our visualization and analysis methods offer researchers, funders, and developers key insights into long-term software sustainability.
