Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Weighted Asymptotically Optimal Sequential Testing

Soumyabrata Bose, Jay Bartroff

Abstract

This paper develops a framework for incorporating prior information into sequential multiple testing procedures while maintaining asymptotic optimality. We define a weighted log-likelihood ratio (WLLR) as an additive modification of the standard LLR and use it to construct two new sequential tests: the Weighted Gap and Weighted Gap-Intersection procedures. We prove that both procedures provide strong control of the family-wise error rate. Our main theoretical contribution is to show that these weighted procedures are asymptotically optimal; their expected stopping times achieve the theoretical lower bound as the error probabilities vanish. This first-order optimality is shown to be robust, holding in high-dimensional regimes where the number of null hypotheses grows and in settings with random weights, provided that mild, interpretable conditions on the weight distribution are met.

Weighted Asymptotically Optimal Sequential Testing

Abstract

This paper develops a framework for incorporating prior information into sequential multiple testing procedures while maintaining asymptotic optimality. We define a weighted log-likelihood ratio (WLLR) as an additive modification of the standard LLR and use it to construct two new sequential tests: the Weighted Gap and Weighted Gap-Intersection procedures. We prove that both procedures provide strong control of the family-wise error rate. Our main theoretical contribution is to show that these weighted procedures are asymptotically optimal; their expected stopping times achieve the theoretical lower bound as the error probabilities vanish. This first-order optimality is shown to be robust, holding in high-dimensional regimes where the number of null hypotheses grows and in settings with random weights, provided that mild, interpretable conditions on the weight distribution are met.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 8 theorems, 60 equations, 1 figure, 1 table.

Key Result

Proposition 4.1

For any true signal set $A$ with $|A| = m$, the FWE of the weighted gap procedure $(T_W, D_W)$ is bounded above by Consequently, to ensure $\sup_{|A| = m} \mathbb{P}_A(D_W \neq A) \le \alpha$, it suffices to choose the threshold $c$ such that where the term $\mathcal{C}_W(m, J)$ is defined as

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Impact of Weight Informativeness on Expected Stopping Time

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Definition 2.1: Class of Admissible Procedures
  • Definition 4.1: Weighted Gap Procedure
  • Proposition 4.1: FWE Control for Weighted Gap Procedure
  • Remark 4.1: The Price of Weighting
  • Remark 4.2: Computation of $\mathcal{C}_W(m, J)$
  • Remark 4.3: Invariance to Scaling
  • Definition 4.2: Weighted Gap-Intersection Procedure
  • Proposition 4.2: FWE Control for Weighted Gap-Intersection Procedure
  • Remark 4.4: Behavior at Interval Boundaries
  • Remark 4.5: Interpretation of Thresholds
  • ...and 20 more