Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Empirical Bolometric Correction and Zero-Point Constants of Visual Magnitudes from High-Resolution Spectra

Gökhan Yücel, Selçuk Bilir, Volkan Bakış, Zeki Eker

TL;DR

This work addresses the arbitrariness of bolometric-correction zero-points by empirically anchoring the BC$_V$ scale to the IAU 2015 definitions. Using 128 high-resolution spectra from multiple instruments, it derives the BC$_V$ zero-point $C_{ m 2}$ from spectroscopic luminosity fractions $L_{ m V}/L$ and fixes the visual zero-points $C_{ m V}$ and $c_{ m V}$, dependent on the chosen visual filter profile $S_\\lambda(V)$. It introduces and fits spectroscopic BC$_V$–$T_{ m eff}$ relations for two $S_\\lambda(V)$ profiles (Bessell 1990 and Landolt 1992) and compares them with a photometric BC$_V$–$T_{ m eff}$ relation, finding the spectroscopic forms substantially more precise. The study shows that, with accurate parallax and modest interstellar extinction, the indirect method can predict stellar luminosities to about 1–5% precision, substantially reducing uncertainties tied to nonstandard BCs and enabling robust luminosity and extinction determinations from high-quality spectra. The framework sets the stage for extending empirical BC calibrations to additional bands and metallicities, with broad implications for stellar parameter determinations and distance-scale work.

Abstract

A method of obtaining bolometric corrections ($BC_{\rm V}$) from observed high-resolution, high-$S/N$ spectra is described. The method is applied to spectra of 128 stars collected from the literature with well-determined effective temperatures ($T_{\rm eff}$) with $S_λ(V)$ transparency profiles of Bessell and Landolt. Computed $BC_{\rm V}$ are found accurate within several milimagnitudes and the effect of different $S_λ(V)$ is found to be no more than 0.015 mag. Measured visual to bolometric ratio ($L_{\rm V}/L$) from the sample spectra and classically determined $BC_{\rm V}$ from bolometric ($M_{\rm Bol}$) and visual ($M_{\rm V}$) absolute magnitudes helped us to determine the zero-point constant ($C_{\rm 2}$) of the $BC_{\rm V}$ scale. Determined $C_{\rm 2}$ for each star for each $S_λ(V)$ profile revealed $C_{\rm 2} = 2.3653\pm0.0067$ mag if $S_λ(V)$ profile of Bessell is used, and $C_{\rm 2} = 2.3826\pm0.0076$ mag if $S_λ(V)$ profile of Landolt is used. Expanding $C_{\rm Bol} = 71.197425 ...$ mag and $c_{\rm Bol} = -18.997351 ...$ mag announced by IAU2015GARB2, and using definition of $C_{\rm 2} = C_{\rm Bol}-C_{\rm V} = c_{\rm Bol}-c_{\rm V}$, where capital $C$ is for the absolute and small $c$ is for the apparent, subscripts indicating bolometric and visual, the zero-point constants: $C_{\rm V} = 68.8321\pm0.0067$ mag and $c_{\rm V} = -21.3627\pm0.0067$ mag, if $L_{\rm V}$ and are in SI units, were determined corresponding to $S_λ(V)$ of Bessell. The zero-point constants corresponding to $S_λ(V)$ of Landolt are smaller, but the difference is not more than 0.02 mag. Typical and limiting accuracies for predicting a stellar luminosity from an apparent magnitude and a distance are analyzed.

Empirical Bolometric Correction and Zero-Point Constants of Visual Magnitudes from High-Resolution Spectra

TL;DR

This work addresses the arbitrariness of bolometric-correction zero-points by empirically anchoring the BC scale to the IAU 2015 definitions. Using 128 high-resolution spectra from multiple instruments, it derives the BC zero-point from spectroscopic luminosity fractions and fixes the visual zero-points and , dependent on the chosen visual filter profile . It introduces and fits spectroscopic BC relations for two profiles (Bessell 1990 and Landolt 1992) and compares them with a photometric BC relation, finding the spectroscopic forms substantially more precise. The study shows that, with accurate parallax and modest interstellar extinction, the indirect method can predict stellar luminosities to about 1–5% precision, substantially reducing uncertainties tied to nonstandard BCs and enabling robust luminosity and extinction determinations from high-quality spectra. The framework sets the stage for extending empirical BC calibrations to additional bands and metallicities, with broad implications for stellar parameter determinations and distance-scale work.

Abstract

A method of obtaining bolometric corrections () from observed high-resolution, high- spectra is described. The method is applied to spectra of 128 stars collected from the literature with well-determined effective temperatures () with transparency profiles of Bessell and Landolt. Computed are found accurate within several milimagnitudes and the effect of different is found to be no more than 0.015 mag. Measured visual to bolometric ratio () from the sample spectra and classically determined from bolometric () and visual () absolute magnitudes helped us to determine the zero-point constant () of the scale. Determined for each star for each profile revealed mag if profile of Bessell is used, and mag if profile of Landolt is used. Expanding mag and mag announced by IAU2015GARB2, and using definition of , where capital is for the absolute and small is for the apparent, subscripts indicating bolometric and visual, the zero-point constants: mag and mag, if and are in SI units, were determined corresponding to of Bessell. The zero-point constants corresponding to of Landolt are smaller, but the difference is not more than 0.02 mag. Typical and limiting accuracies for predicting a stellar luminosity from an apparent magnitude and a distance are analyzed.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 23 sections, 21 equations, 11 figures, 6 tables.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Top panel: SED models of two stars (HD 32630 and HD 208266) with different interstellar extinctions. Bottom panel:$\chi^2$ map of models given in the top panel.
  • Figure 4: Normalized solar spectrum and V filter profile (a), de-normalized flux and V filter spectra (b), and the convoluted spectrum of the Sun (c). Dividing the area under the convoluted spectrum by $\sigma T_{\rm eff}^4 (\odot)$ gives solar $L_{\rm V}/L$ = 10.49 or 10.19 percent for Bessell1990 and the Landolt1992 profile functions, respectively.
  • Figure 6: Distribution of the sample stars on H-R diagram. ZAMS and TAMS, according to PARSEC evolution models Bressan2012 are indicated. Symbols: $\triangle$, HERMES; $\filledtriangleup$, PEPSI; $\bullet$, FIES; $\circ$, FEROS; $\filledsquare$, ESPaDOnS; $\filledsquare$, NARVAL; $\filledtriangledown$, FTS.
  • Figure 7: Uncertainty histograms of $T_{\rm eff}$ (top), $R$ (middle), and $L$ (bottom).
  • Figure 8: Bolometric correction ($BC_{\rm V}$) for the visual magnitudes (bottom) as the difference between the absolute bolometric (top) and the visual (middle) magnitudes. Evolved stars are shown by the filled symbols.
  • ...and 6 more figures