Real and complex spherical designs and their Gramian
Shayne Waldron
TL;DR
This work develops a Gramian-based variational framework to characterise real and complex spherical designs for unitarily invariant polynomial spaces, unifying their treatment via a potential $A_{w,c}$ built from reproducing kernels. When $K(x,y)$ depends only on $\langle x,y\rangle$, the potential reduces to a Gramian function whose zeros identify designs, enabling both analytic characterisations (e.g., for $t$-designs, half-designs, and projective designs) and numerical construction through minimisation. The paper systematically derives real and complex design theories, including Gegenbauer polynomial orthogonality, product rules, and canonical potentials for various design classes, and develops upper and lower bounds on the number of design points (DGS bounds) with extensions to complex and projective settings. It also introduces and exploits operator-rank and annihilator techniques to obtain absolute and special bounds for complex designs, including two- and three-angle configurations, and connects these to classical polynomials such as Jacobi and Gegenbauer, yielding new insights and tight examples. Overall, the framework provides a unified, Gramian-driven approach that advances both the theory and construction of real, complex, and projective spherical designs with practical implications for cubature rules and frame theory.
Abstract
If a (weighted) spherical design is defined as an integration (cubature) rule for a unitarily invariant space P of polynomials (on the sphere), then any unitary image of it is also such a spherical design. It therefore follows that such spherical designs are determined by their Gramian (Gram matrix). We outline a general method to obtain such a characterisation as the minima of a function of the Gramian, which we call a potential. This characterisation can be used for the numerical and analytic construction of spherical designs. When the space P of polynomials is not irreducible under the action of the unitary group, then the potential is not unique. In several cases of interest, e.g., spherical t-designs and half-designs, we use this flexibility to provide potentials with a very simple form. We then use our results to develop certain aspects of the theory of real and complex spherical designs for unitarily invariant polynomial spaces.
