Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations: well-posedness and related particle system

Tao Hao, Ying Hu, Jiaqiang Wen

TL;DR

The paper advances mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations (mean-field BSVIEs) by establishing global well-posedness under linear and quadratic growth in $Z$, even when the generator depends on the law of $(Y,Z)$. It then analyzes particle-system approximations, proving propagation of chaos with explicit convergence rates: ${\cal Q}(N)$ in the linear-growth setting and ${\cal O}(N^{-1/(2\lambda)})$ in the quadratic-growth setting when $g$ is independent of the law of $Z$, using time-slicing, BMO martingale techniques, and Girsanov's theorem. The results extend mean-field BSVIE theory to law-dependent and diagonal-quadratic generators and provide quantitative rates for finite-$N$ approximations, with rate dependence on dimension and integrability. Together, these contributions offer new tools for analyzing large interacting systems modeled by mean-field BSVIEs in finance, economics, and stochastic control.

Abstract

This paper studies the mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations (mean-field BSVIEs) and associated particle systems. We establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions to mean-field BSVIEs when the generator $g$ is of linear growth or quadratic growth with respect to $Z$, respectively. Moreover, the propagation of chaos is analyzed for the corresponding particle systems under two conditions. When $g$ is of linear growth in $Z$, the convergence rate is proven to be of order $\mathscr{Q}(N)$. When $g$ is of quadratic growth in $Z$ and is independent of the law of $Z$, we not only establish the convergence of the particle systems but also derive a convergence rate of order $\mathscr{O}(N^{-\frac{1}{2λ}})$, where $λ>1$.

Mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations: well-posedness and related particle system

TL;DR

The paper advances mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations (mean-field BSVIEs) by establishing global well-posedness under linear and quadratic growth in , even when the generator depends on the law of . It then analyzes particle-system approximations, proving propagation of chaos with explicit convergence rates: in the linear-growth setting and in the quadratic-growth setting when is independent of the law of , using time-slicing, BMO martingale techniques, and Girsanov's theorem. The results extend mean-field BSVIE theory to law-dependent and diagonal-quadratic generators and provide quantitative rates for finite- approximations, with rate dependence on dimension and integrability. Together, these contributions offer new tools for analyzing large interacting systems modeled by mean-field BSVIEs in finance, economics, and stochastic control.

Abstract

This paper studies the mean-field backward stochastic Volterra integral equations (mean-field BSVIEs) and associated particle systems. We establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions to mean-field BSVIEs when the generator is of linear growth or quadratic growth with respect to , respectively. Moreover, the propagation of chaos is analyzed for the corresponding particle systems under two conditions. When is of linear growth in , the convergence rate is proven to be of order . When is of quadratic growth in and is independent of the law of , we not only establish the convergence of the particle systems but also derive a convergence rate of order , where .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 8 theorems, 114 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 3.1

For any given $(y(\cdot), z(\cdot,\cdot))$ and for almost all $t\in[0,T]$, if the following mean-field BSDE admits a unique solution, denoted by $({\cal Y}(t,\cdot),{\cal Z}(t,\cdot))$, then the following mean-field BSVIE also admits a unique solution $(Y(\cdot),Z(\cdot,\cdot))$. Moreover,

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Remark 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.2
  • proof
  • Remark 3.3
  • Proposition 3.4
  • Theorem 3.5
  • proof
  • ...and 8 more