Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$\textrm{U}(n)$-structures and their induced minimal left ideals

Ricardo Suárez

TL;DR

This work builds a bridge between Berger's holonomy-based G-structures and Clifford algebra spinor theory by encoding ${\mathrm U}(n)$-structures through the rational Kahler polynomial $P^{\mathbb{Q}}(\omega_{0})$ and identifying induced minimal left ideals in Clifford algebras ${\mathbb R}_{p,q}$ with these structures. For ${\mathbb R}^{2n}$, a ${\mathrm U}(n)$-structure induces a minimal left ideal in ${\mathbb R}_{n,n}$ and, by projection, embedded ideals in ${\mathbb R}_{n,n+1}$ and ${\mathbb R}_{n,n+2}$, with the primitive idempotent given by $f_{\mathrm{U}(n)}=q^{*}(P^{\mathbb{Q}}(\omega_{0}))$; the type of the spinor module is real, complex, or quaternionic accordingly. The paper provides explicit ${\mathrm U}(3)$-structure examples in ${\mathbb R}_{3,3}$, ${\mathbb R}_{3,4}$, and ${\mathbb R}_{3,5}$, showing how complex and quaternionic structures arise as extensions of the base real spinor space. It also discusses recoverability by projection and lays out a general scheme for recovering ${\mathrm U}(m)$-structures from Clifford algebras of various signatures, including SU and holonomy implications. The results hint at a unified spinorial viewpoint for holonomy-related geometries and motivate future work on spinor bundles and holonomy in broader settings.

Abstract

In previous work, we associated to $\textrm{SU(3)}$, $\mathrm{G}_2$, and $\textrm{Spin(7)}$-structures minimal left ideals for the Clifford algebras $\mathbb{R}_{0,6},\mathbb{R}_{0,7}$, and $\mathbb{R}_{0,8}$, respectively. In this paper, we continue to analyze the link between Berger's classification theorem and the structure theorem of minimal left ideals for Clifford algebras of signature $(p,q)$ by identifying $\mathrm{U}(n)$-structures with minimal left ideals for Clifford algebras of various signatures via the induced Kahler polynomial $P(ω_{0})$ associated with the symplectic form $ω_{0}$ that defines the $\mathrm{U}(n)$-structure as a stabilizer subgroup of $\mathrm{O}(n)$.

$\textrm{U}(n)$-structures and their induced minimal left ideals

TL;DR

This work builds a bridge between Berger's holonomy-based G-structures and Clifford algebra spinor theory by encoding -structures through the rational Kahler polynomial and identifying induced minimal left ideals in Clifford algebras with these structures. For , a -structure induces a minimal left ideal in and, by projection, embedded ideals in and , with the primitive idempotent given by ; the type of the spinor module is real, complex, or quaternionic accordingly. The paper provides explicit -structure examples in , , and , showing how complex and quaternionic structures arise as extensions of the base real spinor space. It also discusses recoverability by projection and lays out a general scheme for recovering -structures from Clifford algebras of various signatures, including SU and holonomy implications. The results hint at a unified spinorial viewpoint for holonomy-related geometries and motivate future work on spinor bundles and holonomy in broader settings.

Abstract

In previous work, we associated to , , and -structures minimal left ideals for the Clifford algebras , and , respectively. In this paper, we continue to analyze the link between Berger's classification theorem and the structure theorem of minimal left ideals for Clifford algebras of signature by identifying -structures with minimal left ideals for Clifford algebras of various signatures via the induced Kahler polynomial associated with the symplectic form that defines the -structure as a stabilizer subgroup of .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 9 theorems, 24 equations, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 2.2

Suppose that $M$ is a simply connected manifold of dimension $n$, and that $g$ is an irreducible, non-symmetric Riemannian metric on $M$. Then exactly one of the following seven cases holds.

Theorems & Definitions (22)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Berger's Theorem
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • Definition 2.10
  • ...and 12 more