Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Lifting $I$-functions from the Grassmannians to their cotangent bundles

Kamyar Amini

TL;DR

The paper builds a purely algebraic balancing framework that lifts the $I$-function of the Grassmannian $G(r,n)$ to the quasimap vertex function of its cotangent bundle $T^*G(r,n)$. By pairing a $\lambda_y$-balanced $K$-theoretic class with a corresponding $q$-difference operator, it shows that the vertex function can be recovered from the $I$-function via the balancing operator, after the substitution $y=-q^{-1}\hbar$. This yields a direct link between the quantum $K$-theory of a base variety and that of its cotangent bundle, compatible with abelianization and leading to Bethe-Ansatz equations in the general Grassmannian case. The results are illustrated by a detailed P^1 example, clarifying the localization and balancing procedures at fixed points. Overall, the work provides a new, concrete mechanism to connect enumerative invariants of a space with those of its cotangent bundle through algebraic twisting and abelian/nonabelian correspondence, with potential applications to integrable systems via Bethe equations.

Abstract

We relate two fundamental enumerative functions, namely the $I$-functions in the quantum $K$-ring of $G(r,n)$ and of its cotangent bundle, by defining a $K$-theoretic operator on classes, called balancing. This operator lifts the $I$-function of $G(r,n)$ to that of $T^*G(r,n)$, providing an explicit geometric interpretation. We also define an operator acting on difference operators and show that, for certain $K$-theoretic functions and the corresponding difference operators that annihilate them, including the $I$-functions of projective spaces $\mathbb{P}^n$, the balancing operation on difference operators and on classes is compatible. Moreover, for general $G(r,n)$, we recover the Bethe-Ansatz equations for $T^*G(r,n)$ via a procedure inspired by both balancing and the abelian/non-abelian correspondence.

Lifting $I$-functions from the Grassmannians to their cotangent bundles

TL;DR

The paper builds a purely algebraic balancing framework that lifts the -function of the Grassmannian to the quasimap vertex function of its cotangent bundle . By pairing a -balanced -theoretic class with a corresponding -difference operator, it shows that the vertex function can be recovered from the -function via the balancing operator, after the substitution . This yields a direct link between the quantum -theory of a base variety and that of its cotangent bundle, compatible with abelianization and leading to Bethe-Ansatz equations in the general Grassmannian case. The results are illustrated by a detailed P^1 example, clarifying the localization and balancing procedures at fixed points. Overall, the work provides a new, concrete mechanism to connect enumerative invariants of a space with those of its cotangent bundle through algebraic twisting and abelian/nonabelian correspondence, with potential applications to integrable systems via Bethe equations.

Abstract

We relate two fundamental enumerative functions, namely the -functions in the quantum -ring of and of its cotangent bundle, by defining a -theoretic operator on classes, called balancing. This operator lifts the -function of to that of , providing an explicit geometric interpretation. We also define an operator acting on difference operators and show that, for certain -theoretic functions and the corresponding difference operators that annihilate them, including the -functions of projective spaces , the balancing operation on difference operators and on classes is compatible. Moreover, for general , we recover the Bethe-Ansatz equations for via a procedure inspired by both balancing and the abelian/non-abelian correspondence.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 sections, 20 theorems, 241 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For $T^*G(r,n)$, the twisted $I$-function of $T^* G(r,n)$ is equal to the quasimap vertex function.

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Definition 1
  • Theorem 1.1: See \ref{['prop:V=I']} below.
  • Definition 2
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Example 1.3
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Definition 3
  • Example 3.2
  • ...and 39 more