Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Extremal poker hand rankings: why the standard 52 card deck and a 3044 card deck are special

Christopher Williamson

TL;DR

This work generalizes poker hand rankings to decks with $r$ ranks (totaling $4r$ cards) and computes frequency-based rankings for all $r$, revealing when (and how) the usual hierarchy changes as the deck scales. It introduces the concept of showdown frequency to capture how players declare hands at showdown under a fixed frequency ranking, exposing Gadbois-type phenomena even without wild cards. The study shows that flushes drop below one-pair only at $r\geq 307$ and that straights become the rarest non-SF hand only at $r\geq 761$, with the frequency ranking stabilizing for $r\geq 761$, while the smallest $r$ where frequency and showdown rankings align (including high-card) is $r=23$. The results illuminate why the standard 52-card deck is a special, relatively stable regime and provide a framework to analyze variant decks and their strategic implications in showdowns.

Abstract

We study poker hand rankings in the partially generalised setting of a deck with $r$ ranks, rather than the typical 13 ranks. We provide the hand rankings for all $r$ and observe some interesting phenomena such as the smallest $r$ such that flushes rank below one-pair hands. Perhaps surprisingly, as $r$ grows without bound, the hand ranking is not stable until $r=761$ (a 3044 card deck). We consider showdown frequency, which is the frequency that a given type of hand is declared by a player at showdown, and make note of counterintuitive instances in which a hand with lower absolute frequency than some other hand nonetheless has a higher showdown frequency. This can be interpreted as a form of Gadbois paradox but in the typical setting of poker without wild cards. Conveniently, the standard deck with 13 ranks turns out to be the smallest deck that avoids a discrepancy between absolute frequency and showdown frequency for all hand types other than having a high card.

Extremal poker hand rankings: why the standard 52 card deck and a 3044 card deck are special

TL;DR

This work generalizes poker hand rankings to decks with ranks (totaling cards) and computes frequency-based rankings for all , revealing when (and how) the usual hierarchy changes as the deck scales. It introduces the concept of showdown frequency to capture how players declare hands at showdown under a fixed frequency ranking, exposing Gadbois-type phenomena even without wild cards. The study shows that flushes drop below one-pair only at and that straights become the rarest non-SF hand only at , with the frequency ranking stabilizing for , while the smallest where frequency and showdown rankings align (including high-card) is . The results illuminate why the standard 52-card deck is a special, relatively stable regime and provide a framework to analyze variant decks and their strategic implications in showdowns.

Abstract

We study poker hand rankings in the partially generalised setting of a deck with ranks, rather than the typical 13 ranks. We provide the hand rankings for all and observe some interesting phenomena such as the smallest such that flushes rank below one-pair hands. Perhaps surprisingly, as grows without bound, the hand ranking is not stable until (a 3044 card deck). We consider showdown frequency, which is the frequency that a given type of hand is declared by a player at showdown, and make note of counterintuitive instances in which a hand with lower absolute frequency than some other hand nonetheless has a higher showdown frequency. This can be interpreted as a form of Gadbois paradox but in the typical setting of poker without wild cards. Conveniently, the standard deck with 13 ranks turns out to be the smallest deck that avoids a discrepancy between absolute frequency and showdown frequency for all hand types other than having a high card.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 2 equations, 1 figure, 2 tables.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Frequency rankings for general $r$. We do not consider $r<5$ as this makes some hand types impossible. The cases $r=9$ and $r=13$ correspond to short-deck poker and standard poker, respectively.