Axial Seamount Eruption Forecasting Experiment
Qinghua Lei, Didier Sornette, William W. Chadwick, Scott L. Nooner, Maochuan Zhang, William S. D. Wilcock
TL;DR
The paper addresses whether imminent volcanic eruptions can be forecast in real time using physics-based precursors. It implements a LPPLS-based forecasting framework to diagnose approaching rupture and estimate a finite-time horizon $t_c$, complemented by three probabilistic methods to quantify uncertainty. A cryptographic timestamping protocol (SHA-256) with delayed public disclosure ensures unbiased, verifiable forecasting and open verification of results. The Axial Seamount dataset, comprising seafloor uplift and seismicity from the OOI-RCA, enables a rigorous test of predictive skill and contributes to a cumulative, testable science of eruption forecasting with transparent reporting of both successes and failures.
Abstract
We introduce the Axial Seamount Eruption Forecasting Experiment (EFE), a real-time initiative designed to test the predictability of volcanic eruptions through a transparent, physics-based framework. The experiment is inspired by the Financial Bubble Experiment, adapting its principles of digital authentication, timestamped archiving, and delayed disclosure to the field of volcanology. The EFE implements a reproducible protocol in which each forecast is securely timestamped and cryptographically hashed (SHA-256) before being made public. The corresponding forecast documents, containing detailed diagnostics and probabilistic analyses, will be released after the next eruption or, if the forecasts are proven incorrect, at a later date. This procedure ensures full transparency while preventing premature interpretation or controversy surrounding public predictions. Forecasts will be issued monthly, or more frequently if required, using real-time monitoring data from the Ocean Observatories Initiative's Regional Cabled Array at Axial Seamount. By committing to publish all forecasts, successful or not, the EFE establishes a scientifically rigorous, falsifiable protocol to evaluate the limits of eruption forecasting. The ultimate goal is to transform eruption prediction into a cumulative and testable science founded on open verification, reproducibility, and physical understanding.
