Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum Search With Generalized Wildcards

Arjan Cornelissen, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro, Nithish Raja, Swagato Sanyal

TL;DR

The paper introduces a unified framework to analyze quantum query complexity for learning a hidden string under restricted substring queries by relating it to an optimization over odd functions, via the primal negative-weight adversary bound. It shows that the quantum complexity $\mathsf{Q}^{\\mathcal{Q}}(\\oplus)$ equals $\\Theta(\\mathsf{val}_{\\mathcal{Q}})$ and derives tight bounds for natural families of query sets: bounded-size, contiguous blocks, prefixes, and only the full set. These results, together with a Fourier-analytic treatment of XOR-structured adversaries, recover known bounds for wildcard models (reducing $O(\sqrt{n}\log n)$ to $O(\sqrt{n}))$ and establish new upper bounds without SDP duality. The findings have implications for string-recovery problems in biology and illuminate the potential of primal adversary techniques as a practical tool for quantum-query upper bounds.

Abstract

In the search with wildcards problem [Ambainis, Montanaro, Quantum Inf.~Comput.'14], one's goal is to learn an unknown bit-string $x \in \{-1,1\}^n$. An algorithm may, at unit cost, test equality of any subset of the hidden string with a string of its choice. Ambainis and Montanaro showed a quantum algorithm of cost $O(\sqrt{n} \log n)$ and a near-matching lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{n})$. Belovs [Comput.~Comp.'15] subsequently showed a tight $O(\sqrt{n})$ upper bound. We consider a natural generalization of this problem, parametrized by a subset $\cal{Q} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$, where an algorithm may test whether $x_S = b$ for an arbitrary $S \in \cal{Q}$ and $b \in \{-1,1\}^S$ of its choice, at unit cost. We show near-tight bounds when $\cal{Q}$ is any of the following collections: bounded-size sets, contiguous blocks, prefixes, and only the full set. All of these results are derived using a framework that we develop. Using symmetries of the task at hand we show that the quantum query complexity of learning $x$ is characterized, up to a constant factor, by an optimization program, which is succinctly described as follows: `maximize over all odd functions $f : \{-1,1\}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ the ratio of the maximum value of $f$ to the maximum (over $T \in \cal{Q}$) standard deviation of $f$ on a subcube whose free variables are exactly $T$.' To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work to use the primal version of the negative-weight adversary bound (which is a maximization program typically used to show lower bounds) to show new quantum query upper bounds without explicitly resorting to SDP duality.

Quantum Search With Generalized Wildcards

TL;DR

The paper introduces a unified framework to analyze quantum query complexity for learning a hidden string under restricted substring queries by relating it to an optimization over odd functions, via the primal negative-weight adversary bound. It shows that the quantum complexity equals and derives tight bounds for natural families of query sets: bounded-size, contiguous blocks, prefixes, and only the full set. These results, together with a Fourier-analytic treatment of XOR-structured adversaries, recover known bounds for wildcard models (reducing to and establish new upper bounds without SDP duality. The findings have implications for string-recovery problems in biology and illuminate the potential of primal adversary techniques as a practical tool for quantum-query upper bounds.

Abstract

In the search with wildcards problem [Ambainis, Montanaro, Quantum Inf.~Comput.'14], one's goal is to learn an unknown bit-string . An algorithm may, at unit cost, test equality of any subset of the hidden string with a string of its choice. Ambainis and Montanaro showed a quantum algorithm of cost and a near-matching lower bound of . Belovs [Comput.~Comp.'15] subsequently showed a tight upper bound. We consider a natural generalization of this problem, parametrized by a subset , where an algorithm may test whether for an arbitrary and of its choice, at unit cost. We show near-tight bounds when is any of the following collections: bounded-size sets, contiguous blocks, prefixes, and only the full set. All of these results are derived using a framework that we develop. Using symmetries of the task at hand we show that the quantum query complexity of learning is characterized, up to a constant factor, by an optimization program, which is succinctly described as follows: `maximize over all odd functions the ratio of the maximum value of to the maximum (over ) standard deviation of on a subcube whose free variables are exactly .' To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work to use the primal version of the negative-weight adversary bound (which is a maximization program typically used to show lower bounds) to show new quantum query upper bounds without explicitly resorting to SDP duality.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 38 sections, 29 theorems, 94 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $n$ be a positive integer and $\mathcal{Q} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$. Then $\mathsf{Q}^\mathcal{Q}(\oplus) = \Theta(\mathsf{val}_\mathcal{Q})$, where

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: A schematic illustration to obtain our framework, which enables us to transform the problem of computing $\mathsf{Q}^{\mathcal{Q}}(\oplus)$, for an arbitrary collection of sets $\mathcal{Q} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$, into the task of analyzing an abstract analytic optimization program $\mathsf{val}_{\mathcal{Q}}$. The solid lines represent exact equalities, whereas the dashed lines represents characterizations up to constants.

Theorems & Definitions (56)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Definition 2.2: Positive semi-definiteness
  • Theorem 2.3: Rei11
  • Lemma 2.5: BC02, also see M18
  • Definition 2.7
  • Proposition 2.8: o2014analysis
  • Corollary 2.9
  • ...and 46 more