Correlation-Powered Work: Equivalence in Peak Yield, Differences in Robustness
Karl Svozil
TL;DR
The paper investigates how different system–environment correlation laws—classical, quantum, and hypothetical stronger-than-quantum—act as thermodynamic resources. Using a generalized second law that incorporates mutual information, it shows that the maximum work extractable per correlated binary system is universally bounded by $k_B T \ln 2$, determined by the initial mutual information; however, the ease of accessing this resource under misalignment differs. Classical correlations degrade linearly with misalignment, quantum correlations degrade quadratically, and stronger-than-quantum correlations would be nearly alignment-insensitive, creating an operational hierarchy captured by an energetic CHSH parameter $\mathcal{S}_W$. A concrete Szilard-engine demonstration and the mutual-information currency bridge thermodynamics and information theory, suggesting that information can function as a physical fuel for microscopic energy resources.
Abstract
Initial system-environment correlations are a thermodynamic resource, enabling work extraction via their erasure. We compare the work potential of classical, quantum, and hypothetical stronger-than-quantum correlations as a function of measurement misalignment. While all models can yield a peak extractable work of k_B T ln 2, corresponding to a mutual information of ln 2, their value as a resource differs critically in its robustness. The classical resource is fragile, decaying linearly with misalignment, whereas the quantum resource is robust, decaying only quadratically. Thus, the degree of nonlocality maps not to the maximum energetic value of a correlation, but to its operational robustness as a thermodynamic fuel.
