Counterexamples to statements on isometric graph coverings
Paul Bastide, Julien Duron, Jędrzej Hodor, Weichan Liu, Xiangxiang Nie
TL;DR
The paper investigates whether structural bounds on a graph $G$ can be inferred when $G$ is edge-covered by a fixed number $k$ of connected isometric subgraphs. It provides negative results by constructing graphs $G_n$ with arbitrarily large treewidth that are edge-covered by $k$ isometric subgraphs for $k\in\{2,3,4\}$, using subdivided walls and incidence-coloring-based gadgets. The results rule out broad transfers of width or depth parameters under such coverings, even when the covering subgraphs are simple (e.g., radius-$2$ trees or basic split graphs), and highlight limits related to subdivision, degree constraints, and subcubic/twin-width phenomena.
Abstract
A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. In this short note, we provide counterexamples to several variants of the following general question: When a graph $G$ is edge covered by connected isometric subgraphs $H_1,\dots,H_k$, which properties of $G$ can we infer from properties of $H_1,\dots,H_k$? For example, Dumas, Foucaud, Perez and Todinca (SIDMA, 2024) proved that when $H_1,\dots,H_k$ are paths, then the pathwidth of $G$ is bounded in terms of $k$. Among others, we show that there are graphs of arbitrarily large treewidth that can be isometrically edge covered by four trees.
