Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the non-Archimedean Hitchin map for $\mathrm{SL}_2(F)$

Jiahuang Chen, Siqi He

TL;DR

The paper develops a non-Archimedean Hitchin theory for SL$_2(F)$ by defining a Hitchin map from the non-Archimedean character variety to holomorphic quadratic differentials via equivariant harmonic maps into the Bruhat–Tits tree $T_F$. It proves the map is continuous and that its image lies in Jenkins–Strebel differentials, leveraging the simplicial nature of $T_F$ to control trajectory structure. A detailed analysis of bounded vs unbounded representations, length functions, and trace data yields a Hausdorffified character variety with a clear division between bounded and unbounded parts, and a dynamical dichotomy on the induced action on $T_F$. The work further links the image of the Hitchin map to JS theory and shows that unbounded irreducible representations lead to non-small actions on the tree, with density notions tied to Zariski/topological closures. Overall, the study provides a foundation for a non-Archimedean analogue of Hitchin fibrations and suggests connections to non-Archimedean Teichmüller–type compactifications.

Abstract

Let $F$ be a non-Archimedean valued field, $Σ$ a closed Riemann surface of genus at least two, and $Γ$ its fundamental group. Building on the theory of equivariant harmonic maps into $\mathbb{R}$-trees, we study the non-Archimedean Hitchin map from the $\mathrm{SL}_2(F)$-character variety $\mathcal{X}_F(Γ)$, equipped with the non-Archimedean topology, to the space of holomorphic quadratic differentials on $Σ$. We prove that this map is continuous and that its image is contained in the space of Jenkins--Strebel differentials. Moreover, we establish a dynamical characterization of unbounded representations, showing that the induced action of $Γ$ on the Bruhat--Tits tree of $\mathrm{SL}_2(F)$ is never small.

On the non-Archimedean Hitchin map for $\mathrm{SL}_2(F)$

TL;DR

The paper develops a non-Archimedean Hitchin theory for SL by defining a Hitchin map from the non-Archimedean character variety to holomorphic quadratic differentials via equivariant harmonic maps into the Bruhat–Tits tree . It proves the map is continuous and that its image lies in Jenkins–Strebel differentials, leveraging the simplicial nature of to control trajectory structure. A detailed analysis of bounded vs unbounded representations, length functions, and trace data yields a Hausdorffified character variety with a clear division between bounded and unbounded parts, and a dynamical dichotomy on the induced action on . The work further links the image of the Hitchin map to JS theory and shows that unbounded irreducible representations lead to non-small actions on the tree, with density notions tied to Zariski/topological closures. Overall, the study provides a foundation for a non-Archimedean analogue of Hitchin fibrations and suggests connections to non-Archimedean Teichmüller–type compactifications.

Abstract

Let be a non-Archimedean valued field, a closed Riemann surface of genus at least two, and its fundamental group. Building on the theory of equivariant harmonic maps into -trees, we study the non-Archimedean Hitchin map from the -character variety , equipped with the non-Archimedean topology, to the space of holomorphic quadratic differentials on . We prove that this map is continuous and that its image is contained in the space of Jenkins--Strebel differentials. Moreover, we establish a dynamical characterization of unbounded representations, showing that the induced action of on the Bruhat--Tits tree of is never small.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 26 sections, 45 theorems, 33 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\mathcal{X}_F(\Gamma)$ be equipped with the non-Archimedean topology, and $H^0(\Sigma,\mathcal{K}_\Sigma^{\otimes 2})$ with the Euclidean topology. Then the Hitchin map $\Phi$ is continuous.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Two-level Bruhat--Tits tree for $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Q}_3)$ (each vertex has $4$ neighbors).
  • Figure 2: A Jenkins-Strebel differential on a genus-$2$ surface and its leaf space
  • Figure 3: Overlaping geodesics

Theorems & Definitions (92)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • ...and 82 more