Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The structure of $Δ(1, 2, 2)$-free tournaments

Seokbeom Kim, Taite LaGrange, Mathieu Rundström, Arpan Sadhukhan, Sophie Spirkl

TL;DR

The paper delivers a complete structural description for $Δ(1,2,2)$-free tournaments by developing a backedge-graph framework and a constructive decomposition: every such tournament is either a basic tournament, a paving-tournament, or derived from a smaller $Δ(1,2,2)$-free by substituting a basic for a nice vertex or by a $P_7^-$-join on a bridge. Central to the approach are the basic tournaments $T_5$, $P_7^-$, and $P_7$, and the operations of substitution and join which preserve the $Δ(1,2,2)$-free property. The authors prove a backedge-graph theorem (components are monotone paths or $H_5$, $H_6$, $H_7$) and develop a triangle-reshuffling technique to realize paving orderings, enabling a full inductive construction. The results yield tight bounds for chromatic number, the size of the largest transitive subtournament, and the maximum number of vertex-disjoint cyclic triangles, advancing Erdős–Hajnal-type insights for tournaments and providing a practical, constructive framework for generating all $Δ(1,2,2)$-free tournaments.

Abstract

We extend the list of tournaments $S$ for which the complete structural description for tournaments excluding $S$ as a subtournament is known. Specifically, let $Δ(1, 2, 2)$ be a tournament on five vertices obtained from a cyclic triangle by substituting a two-vertex tournament for two of its vertices. In this paper, we show that tournaments excluding $Δ(1, 2, 2)$ as a subtournament are either isomorphic to one of three small tournaments, obtained from a transitive tournament by reversing edges in vertex-disjoint directed paths, or obtained from a smaller tournament with the same property by applying one of two operations. In particular, one of these operations creates a homogeneous set that induces a subtournament isomorphic to one of three fixed tournaments, and the other creates a homogeneous pair such that their union induces a subtournament isomorphic to a fixed tournament. As an application of this result, we present an upper bound for the chromatic number, a lower bound for the size of a largest transitive subtournament, and a lower bound for the number of vertex-disjoint cyclic triangles for such tournaments. The bounds that we present are all best possible.

The structure of $Δ(1, 2, 2)$-free tournaments

TL;DR

The paper delivers a complete structural description for -free tournaments by developing a backedge-graph framework and a constructive decomposition: every such tournament is either a basic tournament, a paving-tournament, or derived from a smaller -free by substituting a basic for a nice vertex or by a -join on a bridge. Central to the approach are the basic tournaments , , and , and the operations of substitution and join which preserve the -free property. The authors prove a backedge-graph theorem (components are monotone paths or , , ) and develop a triangle-reshuffling technique to realize paving orderings, enabling a full inductive construction. The results yield tight bounds for chromatic number, the size of the largest transitive subtournament, and the maximum number of vertex-disjoint cyclic triangles, advancing Erdős–Hajnal-type insights for tournaments and providing a practical, constructive framework for generating all -free tournaments.

Abstract

We extend the list of tournaments for which the complete structural description for tournaments excluding as a subtournament is known. Specifically, let be a tournament on five vertices obtained from a cyclic triangle by substituting a two-vertex tournament for two of its vertices. In this paper, we show that tournaments excluding as a subtournament are either isomorphic to one of three small tournaments, obtained from a transitive tournament by reversing edges in vertex-disjoint directed paths, or obtained from a smaller tournament with the same property by applying one of two operations. In particular, one of these operations creates a homogeneous set that induces a subtournament isomorphic to one of three fixed tournaments, and the other creates a homogeneous pair such that their union induces a subtournament isomorphic to a fixed tournament. As an application of this result, we present an upper bound for the chromatic number, a lower bound for the size of a largest transitive subtournament, and a lower bound for the number of vertex-disjoint cyclic triangles for such tournaments. The bounds that we present are all best possible.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 35 theorems, 13 equations, 12 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Every $\Delta(1, 2, 2)$-free tournament has a backedge graph in which each component is either a monotone path or isomorphic to one of $H_5, H_6, H_7$. In particular, the components isomorphic to $H_5$ or $H_7$ are consecutive, and the vertices in each flock of components isomorphic to $H_6$ are con

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Paw, diamond, claw, and bull.
  • Figure 2: The tournament $\Delta(1, 2, 2)$ and its backedge graph with respect to the ordering $\tau = (u_1, \ldots, u_5)$.
  • Figure 3: Three ordered graphs $H_5$, $H_6$, and $H_7$.
  • Figure 4: Tournament $P_7^-$ and its backedge graph with respect to the ordering $\eta = (u_1, \ldots, u_6)$. $(\{u_1, u_2, u_3\}, \{u_4, u_5, u_6\})$ is the degree partition of $P_7^-$.
  • Figure 5: Tournaments $T_7$, $U_7$, and $W_5$. Dashed edges indicated the ones reversed to obtain $U_7$ from $T_7$.
  • ...and 7 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (65)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5: Informal; see \ref{['Thm:triangle-packing']} for the formal statement
  • Theorem 1.5: Informal; see \ref{['Thm:triangle-packing']} for the formal statement
  • Theorem 1.6: Latka Latka03
  • Theorem 1.7: Liu Liu12
  • Theorem 1.8: Liu Liu15
  • Theorem 2.1
  • ...and 55 more