Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rational symbolic powers of ideals

Souvik Dey, Tai Huy Ha, Dipendranath Mahato

TL;DR

The paper introduces rational symbolic powers $\overline{I^{(u)}}$ for ideals in regular local or graded rings and develops a robust parallel to classical symbolic powers, including a primary-decomposition formula for radical ideals, a concrete membership test, and a rational Zariski–Nagata theorem in characteristic $0$. It then connects rational symbolic powers to saturated powers, proving that binomial expansion formulas extend from ordinary to saturated and subsequently to rational symbolic powers in mixed-sum settings. In the monomial case, a convex-geometric description via the symbolic polyhedron yields asymptotic stability of the rational-symbolic filtration and guarantees the existence of limits for asymptotic invariants like regularity and depth, with analogous rational-length limits under suitable hypotheses. Collectively, these results extend core symbolic-power theory to the rational setting and provide tools for understanding asymptotics and convex-geometric structure, especially for squarefree monomial ideals.

Abstract

We introduce and study rational symbolic powers of an ideal in a regular local or graded ring. We show that important results for symbolic powers, such as the Zariski--Nagata theorem or the ideal containment, extend naturally to rational symbolic powers. We investigate the binomial expansion formula for rational symbolic powers of mixed sums of ideals. For a squarefree monomial ideal, we give a convex-geometric description of its rational symbolic powers. We also show that the filtration of rational symbolic powers is asymptotically stable and, as a consequence, deduce that the asymptotic regularity and asymptotic depth for this filtration exist.

Rational symbolic powers of ideals

TL;DR

The paper introduces rational symbolic powers for ideals in regular local or graded rings and develops a robust parallel to classical symbolic powers, including a primary-decomposition formula for radical ideals, a concrete membership test, and a rational Zariski–Nagata theorem in characteristic . It then connects rational symbolic powers to saturated powers, proving that binomial expansion formulas extend from ordinary to saturated and subsequently to rational symbolic powers in mixed-sum settings. In the monomial case, a convex-geometric description via the symbolic polyhedron yields asymptotic stability of the rational-symbolic filtration and guarantees the existence of limits for asymptotic invariants like regularity and depth, with analogous rational-length limits under suitable hypotheses. Collectively, these results extend core symbolic-power theory to the rational setting and provide tools for understanding asymptotics and convex-geometric structure, especially for squarefree monomial ideals.

Abstract

We introduce and study rational symbolic powers of an ideal in a regular local or graded ring. We show that important results for symbolic powers, such as the Zariski--Nagata theorem or the ideal containment, extend naturally to rational symbolic powers. We investigate the binomial expansion formula for rational symbolic powers of mixed sums of ideals. For a squarefree monomial ideal, we give a convex-geometric description of its rational symbolic powers. We also show that the filtration of rational symbolic powers is asymptotically stable and, as a consequence, deduce that the asymptotic regularity and asymptotic depth for this filtration exist.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 16 theorems, 79 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.7

Let $I \subseteq R$ be an ideal with $\mathop{\mathrm{Ass}}\nolimits(R/I)=\mathop{\mathrm{Min}}\nolimits(R/I)=\{{\mathfrak p}_1,\ldots,{\mathfrak p}_n\}$, and let $Q_i$ be the ${\mathfrak p}_i$-primary component of $I$. Then, for all $u\in \mathbb Q_{>0}$, we have $\overline{I^u}R_{{\mathfrak p}_i}\ is the irredundant primary decomposition of $\overline{I^{(u)}}$, and

Theorems & Definitions (54)

  • Definition 2.1: sh
  • Definition 2.2: Rational Symbolic Powers
  • Remark 2.3
  • Example 2.4
  • Example 2.5
  • Remark 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.8
  • proof
  • ...and 44 more