Table of Contents
Fetching ...

'Small' singular regions of spacetime

Franciszek Cudek

TL;DR

The paper addresses how singular structure in classical general relativity, witnessed by $b$-incomplete curves, can be localized within spacetime regions. It proves that any open region containing a $b$-incomplete half-curve contains a smaller singular region that is the image, under the projection $\pi$, of a bounded, incomplete region of the orthonormal frame bundle $O^+M$. A corollary shows that such a half-curve can be covered by a sequence of shrinking singular regions whose diameters tend to zero, indicating a form of locality in the singular structure. The results hinge on relating $b$-incompleteness in $M$ to Cauchy incompleteness in $O^+M$, via lifting curves and, via Hawking and Ellis, establishing the equivalence for natural metrics on $O^+M$, and discuss the physical interpretation and limitations of these natural metrics.

Abstract

We prove that every open connected region of relativistic spacetime $(M,\textbf{g})$ that encloses a $b$-incomplete half-curve has an open connected subregion that encloses a $b$-incomplete half-curve and is also 'small' in the following sense: it is the image, under the bundle projection map, of some open region in the (connected) orthonormal frame bundle $O^+M$ over that spacetime which is bounded, and whose closure is Cauchy incomplete, with respect to any 'natural' distance function on $O^+M$. As a corollary, it follows that every $b$-incomplete half-curve can be covered by a sequence of singular regions which are images of a sequence of bounded subsets of $O^+M$ whose diameter, with respect to any 'natural' distance function on $O^+M$, tends to zero. We discuss to what extent these results can be interpreted in favour of the claim that singular structure in classical general relativity is 'localizable'.

'Small' singular regions of spacetime

TL;DR

The paper addresses how singular structure in classical general relativity, witnessed by -incomplete curves, can be localized within spacetime regions. It proves that any open region containing a -incomplete half-curve contains a smaller singular region that is the image, under the projection , of a bounded, incomplete region of the orthonormal frame bundle . A corollary shows that such a half-curve can be covered by a sequence of shrinking singular regions whose diameters tend to zero, indicating a form of locality in the singular structure. The results hinge on relating -incompleteness in to Cauchy incompleteness in , via lifting curves and, via Hawking and Ellis, establishing the equivalence for natural metrics on , and discuss the physical interpretation and limitations of these natural metrics.

Abstract

We prove that every open connected region of relativistic spacetime that encloses a -incomplete half-curve has an open connected subregion that encloses a -incomplete half-curve and is also 'small' in the following sense: it is the image, under the bundle projection map, of some open region in the (connected) orthonormal frame bundle over that spacetime which is bounded, and whose closure is Cauchy incomplete, with respect to any 'natural' distance function on . As a corollary, it follows that every -incomplete half-curve can be covered by a sequence of singular regions which are images of a sequence of bounded subsets of whose diameter, with respect to any 'natural' distance function on , tends to zero. We discuss to what extent these results can be interpreted in favour of the claim that singular structure in classical general relativity is 'localizable'.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 4 theorems, 2 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Let $(M, \textbf{g})$ be a relativistic spacetime, $U$ be an open subset of $M$, and $O^+M$ be the positive connected component of the orthonormal frame bundle over $(M, \textbf{g})$. Then, if there exists a curve $\gamma: [0,a) \rightarrow M$ with finite generalised affine length, and no endpoint,

Theorems & Definitions (5)

  • Definition 1
  • Proposition 1
  • Corollary 2
  • Theorem 3: Schmidt, Hawking and Ellis
  • Proposition 4