New upper bounds for binary linear covering codes
Alexander A. Davydov, Stefano Marcugini, Fernanda Pambianco
TL;DR
This work advances binary covering codes by delivering new constructive upper bounds on the length function $\ell_2(r,R)$ for radii $R\in\{2,3,4\}$ through innovative binary $q^m$-concatenating constructions. It introduces refined partitions of parity-check matrices and new $(R,\ell)$-objects, enabling several infinite families with significantly improved asymptotic covering densities $\overline{\mu}(R)$ and smaller lengths than previously known. The main results provide explicit bounds such as $\ell_2(r,2)\le26\cdot 2^{r/2-4}-1$, $\ell_2(r,3)\le819\cdot 2^{(r-26)/3}-1$, and $\ell_2(r,4)\le2943\cdot 2^{r/4-10}-1$ for growing $r$ in specified congruence classes, along with new infinite families and sporadic codes. These constructions enhance practical code design for covering problems and offer a pathway toward extending the methodology to radii $R\ge5$.
Abstract
The length function $\ell_2(r,R)$ is the smallest length of a binary linear code with codimension (redundancy) $r$ and covering radius $R$. We obtain the following new upper bounds on $\ell_2(r,R)$, which yield a decrease $Δ(r,R)$ compared to the best previously known upper bounds: \begin{equation*} R=2,\,r=2t,\,r=18,20,\text{ and }r\ge28,\,\ell_2(r,2)\le26\cdot2^{r/2-4}-1;\,Δ(r,2)=2^{r/2-4}. \end{equation*} \begin{equation*} R=3,\,r=3t-1,\,r=26\text{ and }r\ge44,\,\ell_2(r,3)\le819\cdot2^{(r-26)/3}-1;\,Δ(r,3)=2^{(r-23)/3}. \end{equation*} \begin{equation*} R=4,\,r=4t,\,r=40\text{ and }r\ge68,\,\ell_2(r,4)\le2943\cdot2^{r/4-10}-1;\,Δ(r,4)=2^{r/4-10}-1. \end{equation*} To obtain these bounds we construct new infinite code families, using distinct versions of the $q^m$-concatenating constructions of covering codes; some of these versions are proposed in this paper. We also introduce new useful partitions of column sets of parity check matrices of some codes. The asymptotic covering densities $\overlineμ(2)\thickapprox1.3203$, $\overlineμ(3)\thickapprox1.3643$, $\overlineμ(4)\thickapprox2.8428$, provided by the codes of the new families, are smaller than the known ones.
