Many-vs-Many Missile Guidance via Virtual Targets
Marc Schneider, Walter Fichter
TL;DR
This work addresses many-vs-many missile guidance under target uncertainty by replacing direct target assignment with a centralized VT-based strategy. Virtual targets are generated from a Normalizing Flows–based probabilistic trajectory predictor and clustered into $n$ distinct hypotheses, which interceptors pursue via Zero-Effort-Miss guidance in midcourse and Proportional Navigation in endgame. Monte Carlo simulations show that the VT approach matches or slightly exceeds straight-line baselines when $n=m$ and significantly outperforms them when $n>m$, demonstrating that probabilistic, diverse trajectory hypotheses leverage numerical superiority to improve interception probability. The method offers a scalable, data-driven way to handle target uncertainty and multi-agent engagements, with practical implications for robust missile defense design in high-interceptor-count scenarios.
Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to many-vs-many missile guidance using virtual targets (VTs) generated by a Normalizing Flows-based trajectory predictor. Rather than assigning n interceptors directly to m physical targets through conventional weapon target assignment algorithms, we propose a centralized strategy that constructs n VT trajectories representing probabilistic predictions of maneuvering target behavior. Each interceptor is guided toward its assigned VT using Zero-Effort-Miss guidance during midcourse flight, transitioning to Proportional Navigation guidance for terminal interception. This approach treats many-vs-many engagements as many-vs-distribution scenarios, exploiting numerical superiority (n > m) by distributing interceptors across diverse trajectory hypotheses rather than pursuing identical deterministic predictions. Monte Carlo simulations across various target-interceptor configurations (1-6 targets, 1-8 interceptors) demonstrate that the VT method matches or exceeds baseline straight-line prediction performance by 0-4.1% when n = m, with improvements increasing to 5.8-14.4% when n > m. The results confirm that probabilistic VTs enable effective exploitation of numerical superiority, significantly increasing interception probability in many-vs-many scenarios.
