A structure theorem for polynomial return-time sets in minimal systems
Daniel Glasscock, Andreas Koutsogiannis, Anh N. Le, Joel Moreira, Florian K. Richter, Donald Robertson
TL;DR
This work develops a structure theorem for polynomial return-time sets in minimal topological dynamical systems, showing that return-time behavior along polynomial tuples is governed by the maximal $\infty$-step pronilfactor up to a non-piecewise-syndetic discrepancy. Building on topological characteristic-factor theory and IP-polynomial Szemerédi methods, the authors lift recurrence information from pronilfactors to the ambient system, enabling four main applications: linear recurrence on dynamically syndetic sets, polynomial recurrence along progressions, recurrence in totally minimal systems, and a unification of two major conjectures (Glasner–Huang–Shao–Weiss–Ye and Leibman). The results reduce polynomial recurrence questions to inverse limits of nilsystems, providing new recurrence theorems and a framework to compare conjectural landscapes across topological and ergodic settings. The paper also discusses essential distinctness, interiors, non-invertible extensions, and potential ergodic analogues, outlining several open questions and future directions.
Abstract
We investigate the structure of return-time sets determined by orbits along polynomial tuples in minimal topological dynamical systems. Building on the topological characteristic factor theory of Glasner, Huang, Shao, Weiss, and Ye, we prove a structure theorem showing that, in a minimal system, return-time sets coincide -- up to a non-piecewise syndetic set -- with those in its maximal infinite-step pronilfactor. As applications, we establish three new multiple recurrence theorems concerning linear recurrence along dynamically defined syndetic sets and polynomial recurrence along arithmetic progressions in minimal and totally minimal systems. We also show how our main theorem can be used to prove that two previously separate conjectures -- one due to Glasner, Huang, Shao, Weiss, and Ye and the other due to Leibman -- are equivalent.
