A JWST Transit of a Jupiter Analog I: Constraints on the Oblateness of Kepler-167e
Ben Cassese, David Kipping, Quentin Changeat, Daniel A. Yahalomi, Justin Vega, Yayaati Chachan, Billy Edwards, Alex Teachey
TL;DR
This study tackles the challenge of constraining the oblateness of a Jupiter-analog exoplanet, Kepler-167 e, from a long JWST transit by exploring a comprehensive grid of data reductions, limb-darkening treatments, and trend models. Using gradient-based MLE and Bayesian nested sampling across 60–72 viable combinations, the authors find that spherical and oblate planet models fit the data comparably well, with the 95% upper bound on the projected oblateness $f$ reaching $<0.097$ (and as tight as $<0.065$ in some pipelines). Translating $f$ into a rotation period via the Darwin–Radau relation yields $P\gtrsim7.11$–$7.18$ hours for aligned spin axes, though orientation uncertainties can relax this bound to a few hours. The work highlights the critical role of correlated noise and pipeline choice in oblateness measurements with JWST and argues for end-to-end, multi-pipeline analyses and single-exposure designs to achieve tighter constraints in future studies.
Abstract
In October 2024 JWST observed a transit of Kepler-167e, a Jupiter-analog planet on a 1000+ day orbit. These observations, recorded over a long baseline of nearly 60 hours, were designed to search for signatures of planetary oblateness and/or exomoons comparable to Ganymede. In this first in a series of studies analyzing these data we report on constraints on Kepler-167e's oblateness. We explored a large grid of data reduction pipelines and modeling choices, including a new entirely independent reduction pipeline ("katahdin") and two new treatments for limb darkening. We find that under a Bayesian model comparison framework the data are fit equally well by both spherical and oblate planet models, and that our ability to constrain the oblateness is negatively impacted by the influence of exposure-long trends. Using the most conservative of our posteriors, we place a 95% upper bound on the projected oblateness of $f<0.097$, which corresponds to a rotation period of $P\geq7.11$ hours if the planet's spin axis is aligned with the sky plane. We note, however, that the final bound depends on the choice of reduction pipeline and systematics model, and that our suite of end-to-end analyses produced bounds as low as $f<0.065$ at 95%. We conclude that leveraging JWST to make tighter constraints on planetary oblateness will require further investigation into mitigating exposure-long trends and correlated noise.
