Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Derived category of coherent systems on curves and stability conditions

Soheyla Feyzbakhsh, Aliaksandra Novik

TL;DR

The paper introduces a stability-theoretic framework for the derived category of coherent systems on a smooth projective curve $C$ of genus $g>0$, showing that an open two-dimensional slice of Bridgeland stability conditions on $\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{T}_C)$ is governed by two complementary constructions: tilting stability along $\mu$-stability enriched by Brill-Noether data and gluing stability along a natural semi-orthogonal decomposition. It proves that, up to the $\widetilde{\mathrm{GL}}^{+}(2,\mathbb{R})$-action, any stability condition in the open locus $\mathrm{Stab}^{\circ}(\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{T}_C))$ is either a gluing $\operatorname{gl}^{(1)}(\sigma_{\mathcal{V}},\sigma_g)$ with $f(0)<\tfrac{1}{2}$ or a tilting type described by $(b,w)$ with $w>\Phi_C(b)$, where $\Phi_C$ is the Brill-Noether function of $C$. The main results connect wall-crossing in this two-dimensional slice to the Brill-Noether theory of $C$, relate large-volume behavior to classical $\alpha$-stability for coherent systems, and, in a second gluing, classify stability conditions arising from the semi-orthogonal decompositions, linking geometric stability of vector bundles to the derived category of coherent systems. These constructions yield a precise description of the stability manifold $\mathrm{Stab}^{\circ}(\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{T}_C))$ as a union of explicit open sets, and provide a robust bridge between Bridgeland stability, coherent systems, and Brill-Noether theory with potential applications to moduli and birational geometry of vector bundles on curves.

Abstract

Let $C$ be a smooth projective curve of genus $g>0$. We describe an open locus of Bridgeland stability conditions on the bounded derived category of coherent systems on $C$, and show that stability manifold detects the Brill--Noether theory of the curve.

Derived category of coherent systems on curves and stability conditions

TL;DR

The paper introduces a stability-theoretic framework for the derived category of coherent systems on a smooth projective curve of genus , showing that an open two-dimensional slice of Bridgeland stability conditions on is governed by two complementary constructions: tilting stability along -stability enriched by Brill-Noether data and gluing stability along a natural semi-orthogonal decomposition. It proves that, up to the -action, any stability condition in the open locus is either a gluing with or a tilting type described by with , where is the Brill-Noether function of . The main results connect wall-crossing in this two-dimensional slice to the Brill-Noether theory of , relate large-volume behavior to classical -stability for coherent systems, and, in a second gluing, classify stability conditions arising from the semi-orthogonal decompositions, linking geometric stability of vector bundles to the derived category of coherent systems. These constructions yield a precise description of the stability manifold as a union of explicit open sets, and provide a robust bridge between Bridgeland stability, coherent systems, and Brill-Noether theory with potential applications to moduli and birational geometry of vector bundles on curves.

Abstract

Let be a smooth projective curve of genus . We describe an open locus of Bridgeland stability conditions on the bounded derived category of coherent systems on , and show that stability manifold detects the Brill--Noether theory of the curve.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 41 theorems, 165 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Up to the action of $\widetilde{\textnormal{GL}}^{+}(2,\mathbb{R})$, any stability condition $\sigma \in \mathrm{Stab}^{\circ}(\mathcal{D}(\mathcal{T}_C))$ is of one of the following types:

Theorems & Definitions (75)

  • Theorem 1.1: = Theorem \ref{['thm-main']}
  • Corollary 1.2: = Corollary \ref{['cor complex manifold']}
  • Theorem 1.3: = Theorem \ref{['thm-second open subset']}
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 65 more