Representation of the Luttinger Liquid with Single Point-like Impurity as a Field Theory for the Phase of Scattering
V. V. Afonin
TL;DR
This work develops a nonlocal field theory for a Luttinger liquid with a point-like impurity by promoting the scattering phase α to a dynamical field via Hubbard's trick, yielding a UV-finite action that accurately describes impurity–electron interactions up to moderate to strong e–e coupling (ν<1/2). It establishes a duality between attracting and repulsive interactions, derives the impurity action as log Det_{imp}[α], and formulates a renormalization-group treatment that goes beyond leading-log order, revealing limitations of the conventional 'poor man's' RG at two loops. The framework relates low-frequency conductance to renormalized scattering data through quantities like Re K_ω^2 and Re 𝓡_ω^2, and it shows how UV regularization shapes the ω-dependence of transport, including a crossover to linear ω scaling for strong interactions. Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive nonlocal-field-theory approach to impurity effects in LLs, clarifying the ground-state structure, RG structure, and transport signatures in both attracting and repulsive regimes.
Abstract
A new approach describing Luttinger Liquid with point-like impurity as field theory for the phase of scattering is developed. It based on a matching of the electron wave functions at impurity position point. As a result of the approach, an expression for non-local action has been taken. The non-locality of the theory leads to convergence of the observed values in an ultraviolet region. It allows studying conductance of the channel up to electron-electron interaction strength of the order of unit. Expansion of the non-local action in small frequency powers makes possible to develop a new approach to the renormalization group analysis of the problem. This method differs from the "poor man's" approach widely used in solid-state physics. We have shown, in the Luttinger Liquid "poor man's" approach breaks already in two-loop approximation. We analyse the reason of this discrepancy. The qualitative picture of the phenomenon is discussed.
