Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Constraints on Lefschetz fibrations with four-dimensional fibers from Seiberg-Witten theory

Hokuto Konno, Jianfeng Lin, Anubhav Mukherjee, Juan Muñoz-Echániz

TL;DR

This work develops a framework to constrain smooth Lefschetz fibrations and diffeomorphisms on 4-manifolds by connecting Seiberg–Witten theory, framed bordism of family moduli spaces, and Lefschetz-fibration data. Central to the approach is the spin-number invariant $\triangle(S_1,\ldots,S_n)\in \pi_1SO(b^+(X))$, defined from framings of the $H^+$-bundle and shown to control whether a homologically-trivial product of Dehn twists is smoothly trivial; $ riangle$ is preserved under mutations and relates to Lefschetz-fibration characteristic classes. The paper introduces and analyzes the family Bauer–Furuta invariant $\text{FBF}$, proves key vanishing and framing-change results (notably for Dehn twists), and uses excision to prove a main parity constraint: under suitable SW-conditions, Ind$(D^+(E,\frak{s}_E))$ modulo 2 equals $w_2(H^+(f))\cdot [\Sigma]$, which together with $\triangle$ yields obstructions to smooth isotopy of monodromies. Applied to explicit constructions (e.g., Milnor fibers from exceptional unimodal singularities and elliptic surfaces), these obstructions produce the first known examples of simply-connected symplectic 4-manifolds with Torelli elements not generated by squared Dehn–Seidel twists, as well as irreducible 4-manifolds admitting exotic Seifert-fibered Dehn twists; and they extend to non-symplectic irreducible manifolds. Overall, the results deepen understanding of the gap between smooth and topological/diffeomorphic structures in dimension four and expand the toolkit for detecting exotic diffeomorphisms via 6-manifold Lefschetz-fibration topology. $

Abstract

We establish constraints on the topology of smooth Lefschetz fibrations with $4$-dimensional fibers, by studying the family Bauer-Furuta invariant. To compute this invariant, we analyze the framed bordism class of 1-dimensional Seiberg-Witten moduli spaces using the local index theorem by Bismut-Freed. Using this, we deduce new obstructions to the smooth isotopy to the identity for compositions of Dehn twists on $(-2)$-spheres in closed $4$-manifolds. We obtain several applications: (1) We exhibit the first examples of closed simply-connected symplectic $4$-manifolds admitting Torelli symplectomorphisms which are smoothly non-trivial. In particular, their symplectic Torelli mapping class group is not generated by squared Dehn-Seidel twists on Lagrangian spheres -- providing a negative answer to a question of Donaldson. (2) We provide the first examples of irreducible closed $4$-manifolds (both symplectic and non-symplectic) that admit exotic diffeomorphisms given by Seifert-fibered Dehn twist.

Constraints on Lefschetz fibrations with four-dimensional fibers from Seiberg-Witten theory

TL;DR

This work develops a framework to constrain smooth Lefschetz fibrations and diffeomorphisms on 4-manifolds by connecting Seiberg–Witten theory, framed bordism of family moduli spaces, and Lefschetz-fibration data. Central to the approach is the spin-number invariant , defined from framings of the -bundle and shown to control whether a homologically-trivial product of Dehn twists is smoothly trivial; is preserved under mutations and relates to Lefschetz-fibration characteristic classes. The paper introduces and analyzes the family Bauer–Furuta invariant , proves key vanishing and framing-change results (notably for Dehn twists), and uses excision to prove a main parity constraint: under suitable SW-conditions, Ind modulo 2 equals , which together with yields obstructions to smooth isotopy of monodromies. Applied to explicit constructions (e.g., Milnor fibers from exceptional unimodal singularities and elliptic surfaces), these obstructions produce the first known examples of simply-connected symplectic 4-manifolds with Torelli elements not generated by squared Dehn–Seidel twists, as well as irreducible 4-manifolds admitting exotic Seifert-fibered Dehn twists; and they extend to non-symplectic irreducible manifolds. Overall, the results deepen understanding of the gap between smooth and topological/diffeomorphic structures in dimension four and expand the toolkit for detecting exotic diffeomorphisms via 6-manifold Lefschetz-fibration topology. $

Abstract

We establish constraints on the topology of smooth Lefschetz fibrations with -dimensional fibers, by studying the family Bauer-Furuta invariant. To compute this invariant, we analyze the framed bordism class of 1-dimensional Seiberg-Witten moduli spaces using the local index theorem by Bismut-Freed. Using this, we deduce new obstructions to the smooth isotopy to the identity for compositions of Dehn twists on -spheres in closed -manifolds. We obtain several applications: (1) We exhibit the first examples of closed simply-connected symplectic -manifolds admitting Torelli symplectomorphisms which are smoothly non-trivial. In particular, their symplectic Torelli mapping class group is not generated by squared Dehn-Seidel twists on Lagrangian spheres -- providing a negative answer to a question of Donaldson. (2) We provide the first examples of irreducible closed -manifolds (both symplectic and non-symplectic) that admit exotic diffeomorphisms given by Seifert-fibered Dehn twist.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 35 sections, 40 theorems, 196 equations, 5 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem A

There exist infinitely many simply-connected closed minimal symplectic 4-manifolds $(X, \omega)$ for which $K(X, \omega ) \neq I(X, \omega )$.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Schematic depiction of the spin number $\Delta (S_1 , \ldots , S_n )$ as a loop in $\mathcal{E}$ based at $e_0$.
  • Figure 2: Gabrielov's Dynkin diagram for the exceptional unimodal singularities.
  • Figure 3: $\Delta = [\eta ]$ for the exceptional unimodal singularities $E_{12}$ (e.g. $x^2 + y^3 + y^7 = 0$) and $E_{14}$ (e.g. $x^2 + y^3 + z^8 = 0$).
  • Figure :
  • Figure :

Theorems & Definitions (85)

  • Theorem A
  • Remark 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Theorem B
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Example 1.4
  • Theorem C
  • Corollary 1.5
  • Example 1.6
  • Definition 2.1
  • ...and 75 more