Table of Contents
Fetching ...

How to bound Klarner's constant without (a huge number of) Klarner--Rivest twigs

Vuong Bui

TL;DR

The paper addresses the long-standing problem of bounding Klarner's constant $\lambda$, the exponential growth rate of polyominoes. It introduces a recurrence-based framework of interacting local neighborhoods (twigs) that replaces exhaustive trillions of configurations with a compact, verifiable one-page system of convolution-type recurrences. Using a simple positivity-lemma approach, it first achieves $\lambda \le 4.63$, then tightens to $\lambda \le 4.5238$ by expanding the neighborhood types and their interactions. The method is modular and extensible, offering a practical path to improved bounds for other combinatorial systems governed by local constraints.

Abstract

Although known lower bounds for the growth rate $λ$ of polyominoes, or Klarner's constant, are already close to the empirically estimated value $4.06$, almost no conceptual progress on upper bounds has occurred since the seminal work of Klarner and Rivest (1973). Their approach, based on enumerating millions of local neighborhoods (``twigs'') yielded $λ\le 4.649551$, later refined by Barequet and Shalah (2022) to $λ\le 4.5252$ using trillions of configurations. The inefficiency lies in representing each polyomino as an almost unrestricted sequence of twigs once the large set of neighborhoods is fixed. We introduce a recurrence-based framework that constrains how local neighborhoods concatenate. Using a small system of convolution-type recurrences, we obtain $λ\le 4.5238$. The proof is short, self-contained, and fully verifiable by hand. Despite the marginal numerical improvement, the main contribution is methodological: replacing trillions of configurations with a concise one-page system of recurrences. The framework can be extended, with modest computational assistance, to further tighten the bound and to address other combinatorial systems governed by similar local constraints.

How to bound Klarner's constant without (a huge number of) Klarner--Rivest twigs

TL;DR

The paper addresses the long-standing problem of bounding Klarner's constant , the exponential growth rate of polyominoes. It introduces a recurrence-based framework of interacting local neighborhoods (twigs) that replaces exhaustive trillions of configurations with a compact, verifiable one-page system of convolution-type recurrences. Using a simple positivity-lemma approach, it first achieves , then tightens to by expanding the neighborhood types and their interactions. The method is modular and extensible, offering a practical path to improved bounds for other combinatorial systems governed by local constraints.

Abstract

Although known lower bounds for the growth rate of polyominoes, or Klarner's constant, are already close to the empirically estimated value , almost no conceptual progress on upper bounds has occurred since the seminal work of Klarner and Rivest (1973). Their approach, based on enumerating millions of local neighborhoods (``twigs'') yielded , later refined by Barequet and Shalah (2022) to using trillions of configurations. The inefficiency lies in representing each polyomino as an almost unrestricted sequence of twigs once the large set of neighborhoods is fixed. We introduce a recurrence-based framework that constrains how local neighborhoods concatenate. Using a small system of convolution-type recurrences, we obtain . The proof is short, self-contained, and fully verifiable by hand. Despite the marginal numerical improvement, the main contribution is methodological: replacing trillions of configurations with a concise one-page system of recurrences. The framework can be extended, with modest computational assistance, to further tighten the bound and to address other combinatorial systems governed by similar local constraints.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 6 theorems, 62 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1

For $n\ge 2$,

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • Corollary 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • ...and 1 more