Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An orthogonal bimodule decomposition of quantized tensor space realizing Jimbo's Schur--Weyl duality

Stephen Doty, Anthony Giaquinto, Stuart Martin

TL;DR

The paper provides a complete, combinatorial realization of the isotypic semisimple decomposition of $V_q^{\otimes r}$ under the commuting actions of $\mathbf{U}_q(\mathfrak{gl}_n)$ and $\mathbf{H}_q(\mathfrak{S}_r)$, indexing components by walks on the Bratteli diagram. It introduces the $\Psi$ and $\Phi$ operators, built from Coxeter monomials, to construct explicit pairwise-orthogonal highest-weight vectors $\mathfrak{c}_\pi$ corresponding to each Bratteli walk $\pi$, thereby realizing the decomposition into $V_q(\lambda)\otimes \mathsf{S}_q^\lambda$ and its multiplicities. The work proves orthogonality and completeness of these vectors, yielding a hands-on basis for the isotypic components and a basis for invariants of the restricted $\mathbf{U}_q(\mathfrak{sl}_n)$-action. It also furnishes a self-contained proof of Jimbo’s Schur--Weyl duality over any field with $q\ne 0$ not a root of unity, and provides an elementary, implementable combinatorial construction that may extend to other types.

Abstract

Consider the vector representation $V_q$ of the quantized enveloping algebra $\mathbf{U}_q(\mathfrak{gl}_n)$. For $q$ generic, Jimbo showed that $q$-tensor space $V_q^{\otimes r}$ satisfies Schur--Weyl duality for the commuting actions of $\mathbf{U}_q(\mathfrak{gl}_n)$ and the Iwahori--Hecke algebra $\mathbf{H}_q(\mathfrak{S}_r)$, with the latter action derived from the $R$-matrix. In the limit as $q \to 1$, one recovers classical Schur--Weyl duality. We give a combinatorial realization of the corresponding isotypic semisimple decomposition of $V_q^{\otimes r}$ indexed by paths in the Bratteli diagram. This extends earlier work (\emph{Journal of Algebra} 2024) of the first two authors for the $n=2$ case. Our construction works over any field containing a non-zero element $q$ which is not a root of unity.

An orthogonal bimodule decomposition of quantized tensor space realizing Jimbo's Schur--Weyl duality

TL;DR

The paper provides a complete, combinatorial realization of the isotypic semisimple decomposition of under the commuting actions of and , indexing components by walks on the Bratteli diagram. It introduces the and operators, built from Coxeter monomials, to construct explicit pairwise-orthogonal highest-weight vectors corresponding to each Bratteli walk , thereby realizing the decomposition into and its multiplicities. The work proves orthogonality and completeness of these vectors, yielding a hands-on basis for the isotypic components and a basis for invariants of the restricted -action. It also furnishes a self-contained proof of Jimbo’s Schur--Weyl duality over any field with not a root of unity, and provides an elementary, implementable combinatorial construction that may extend to other types.

Abstract

Consider the vector representation of the quantized enveloping algebra . For generic, Jimbo showed that -tensor space satisfies Schur--Weyl duality for the commuting actions of and the Iwahori--Hecke algebra , with the latter action derived from the -matrix. In the limit as , one recovers classical Schur--Weyl duality. We give a combinatorial realization of the corresponding isotypic semisimple decomposition of indexed by paths in the Bratteli diagram. This extends earlier work (\emph{Journal of Algebra} 2024) of the first two authors for the case. Our construction works over any field containing a non-zero element which is not a root of unity.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 29 theorems, 117 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Suppose that $0 \ne q \in \Bbbk$ is not a root of unity. We write $\pi \to \lambda$ to mean that a walk $\pi$ terminates at a node $\lambda$ in the Bratteli diagram. Let $\lambda$ be a partition of $r$ into not more than $n$ parts. Then:

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Bratteli diagram up to level $4$

Theorems & Definitions (66)

  • Theorem
  • Corollary
  • Remark 2.1
  • Theorem 3.1: Lusztig, Andersen--Polo--Wen, etc
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2: Jimbo
  • proof
  • Remark 3.3
  • Theorem 3.4: Jimbo
  • proof
  • ...and 56 more