Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The $N_H$ Distribution of Hard X-ray Selected AGN in the NEP Field

Samantha Creech, Francesca Civano, Daniel R. Wik, Ross Silver, Xiurui Zhao, Rafael Ortiz, Tonima Ananna, Normal A. Grogin, Rolf Jansen, Anton M. Koekemoer, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Rogier A. Windhorst

TL;DR

This study analyzes 60 hard X-ray sources in the JWST NEP field using NuSTAR and overlapping XMM-Newton data to derive the obscuration properties of AGN. Employing two spectral models, a baseline absorbed powerlaw and the uxclumpy torus model, within a Bayesian framework (BXA/UltraNest), the authors determine both the observed and intrinsic distributions of hydrogen column density $N_{ m H}$ and quantify the Compton Thick fraction $f_{ m CT}$. They find an observed $f_{ m CT} = 0.13^{+0.15}_{-0.04}$ (and $0.30^{+0.21}_{-0.08}$ intrinsic) down to an 8–24 keV flux of $6.0 imes 10^{-14}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$, consistent with population synthesis models, while suggesting possible redshift evolution with higher CT incidence at $z > 1$. The NEP field data, including deep, simultaneous soft and hard X-ray coverage, provide a high-signal measure of AGN obscuration and underscore the need for broader spectral models and more complete redshift information for robust evolutionary trends.

Abstract

X-ray surveys are one of the most unbiased methods for detecting Compton Thick (CT; $N_{\mathrm{H}} \geq 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$) AGN, which are thought to comprise up to $60\%$ of AGN within $z \lesssim 1.0$. These CT AGN are often difficult to detect with current instruments, but the X-ray data within the JWST-North Ecliptic Pole (NEP) Time Domain Field (TDF) present a unique opportunity to study faint and obscured AGN. The NEP contains the deepest NuSTAR survey to date, and Zhao et al. (2024) detected 60 hard X-ray sources from the combined exposure of NuSTAR's Cycle 5 and 6 observations. In this work, we utilize the NuSTAR Cycle 5+6+8+9 data and simultaneous XMM-Newton observations in order to perform the first spectroscopic analysis of the 60-source catalog. We present this analysis and measure the $N_{\mathrm{H}}$ distribution of the sample. We measure an observed CT fraction of $0.13_{-0.04}^{+0.15}$ down to an observed $8-24$ keV flux of $6.0 \times 10^{-14}$ erg/s/cm$^{2}$, and we correct our analysis for absorption bias to estimate an underlying CT fraction of $0.32_{-0.08}^{+0.23}$. The derived obscuration distribution and CT fraction are consistent with population synthesis models and previous surveys.

The $N_H$ Distribution of Hard X-ray Selected AGN in the NEP Field

TL;DR

This study analyzes 60 hard X-ray sources in the JWST NEP field using NuSTAR and overlapping XMM-Newton data to derive the obscuration properties of AGN. Employing two spectral models, a baseline absorbed powerlaw and the uxclumpy torus model, within a Bayesian framework (BXA/UltraNest), the authors determine both the observed and intrinsic distributions of hydrogen column density and quantify the Compton Thick fraction . They find an observed (and intrinsic) down to an 8–24 keV flux of erg s cm, consistent with population synthesis models, while suggesting possible redshift evolution with higher CT incidence at . The NEP field data, including deep, simultaneous soft and hard X-ray coverage, provide a high-signal measure of AGN obscuration and underscore the need for broader spectral models and more complete redshift information for robust evolutionary trends.

Abstract

X-ray surveys are one of the most unbiased methods for detecting Compton Thick (CT; cm) AGN, which are thought to comprise up to of AGN within . These CT AGN are often difficult to detect with current instruments, but the X-ray data within the JWST-North Ecliptic Pole (NEP) Time Domain Field (TDF) present a unique opportunity to study faint and obscured AGN. The NEP contains the deepest NuSTAR survey to date, and Zhao et al. (2024) detected 60 hard X-ray sources from the combined exposure of NuSTAR's Cycle 5 and 6 observations. In this work, we utilize the NuSTAR Cycle 5+6+8+9 data and simultaneous XMM-Newton observations in order to perform the first spectroscopic analysis of the 60-source catalog. We present this analysis and measure the distribution of the sample. We measure an observed CT fraction of down to an observed keV flux of erg/s/cm, and we correct our analysis for absorption bias to estimate an underlying CT fraction of . The derived obscuration distribution and CT fraction are consistent with population synthesis models and previous surveys.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 4 equations, 11 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: The redshifts (left) and observed 3-24 keV X-ray luminosities (right) for sources with detected multi-wavelength counterparts. Shown are quasars (dotted; pink), galaxies (hashed; purple), and unclassified (solid; gray) objects.
  • Figure 2: A histogram of the net spectral counts in NuSTAR (pink; dotted) and XMM-Newton (purple; hashed) for the sources in our sample.
  • Figure 3: A schematic demonstrating the spectral components (unabsorbed (purple; dashed) and absorbed (purple; dotted) primary powerlaw, scattered powerlaw (red; dot-dashed), and galactic emission (gold; solid)) of the baseline model described in Section \ref{['sec:models']}. This model is shown for a typical Compton Thin AGN with $N_{\mathrm{H}} = 10^{23}$ cm$^{-2}$. The total spectrum is shown in bolded black. The background is shaded to demonstrate the energy range of XMM-Newton (gray) and NuSTAR (purple).
  • Figure 4: A comparison of the best-fit column densities ($N_{\mathrm{H}}$) for the baseline and clumpy models. The shaded regions mark the Compton Thin (purple) and Compton Thick (gray) regimes. Sources without redshift measurements are shown as red squares.
  • Figure 5: The effective number $N$ and fraction $f_{N_\mathrm{H}}$ of AGN observed in each log($N_{\mathrm{H}}$) bin within $1 \sigma$ for the baseline (pink; hatched) and clumpy (purple; dotted) models, as derived by integrating the summed PDF shown in Figure \ref{['fig:nh_pdf']} (Appendix \ref{['apendix-fits']}).
  • ...and 6 more figures