Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Free resolutions and marked families

Cristina Bertone, Francesca Cioffi, Paolo Lella

TL;DR

The paper develops a comprehensive framework for marked bases over quasi-stable (Pommaret) modules and their syzygies, introducing the $U$-resolution and a rich functorial viewpoint. It proves key minimality criteria, relating minimal $U$-resolutions to componentwise linearity, and demonstrates how Betti numbers of marked-basis-generated modules are controlled by the underlying $U$-resolution. It then constructs and analyzes functors that parameterize marked bases, their syzygies, and whole resolutions, showing representability and natural isomorphisms with the marked scheme $\mathbf{Mf}_U$, and provides explicit schemes and projections (including the second-factor projection) that connect coefficients of syzygies to those of marked bases. The work culminates in detailed examples and an application to Hilbert schemes, illustrating how marked schemes encode loci of componentwise linear ideals and their syzygy structures, with explicit parameter-elimination results via depth conditions.

Abstract

Let $\mathbb{K}$ be a field and $A$ a Noetherian $\mathbb{K}$-algebra. In a paper of 2020, M. Albert, C. Bertone, M. Roggero and W. M. Seiler proved that, given a quasi-stable module $U \subset R^m$ with $R=\mathbb{K}[x_0,\dots,x_n]$, any submodule $M\subseteq (R\otimes A)^m$ generated by a marked basis over $U$ admits a special free resolution described in terms of marked bases as well, called the {\em $U$-resolution of $M$}. In this paper, we first investigate the minimality of the $U$-resolution and its structure. When $M$ is an ideal and $A=\mathbb{K}$, we show that $M$ is componentwise linear if and only if its $U$-resolution is minimal, up to a linear change of variables. Then, adopting a functorial approach to the construction of the $U$-resolution, we prove that certain functors naturally associated with the resolution are isomorphic. These isomorphisms arise from the fact that the marked basis of the $i$-th syzygy module in the $U$-resolution can be expressed in terms of the coefficients of the marked basis of $M$. Moreover, when $M$ is an ideal of depth at least 2, this correspondence can be reversed: in this case, the marked basis of $M$ itself can be written in terms of the coefficients of the marked basis of its first syzygy module.

Free resolutions and marked families

TL;DR

The paper develops a comprehensive framework for marked bases over quasi-stable (Pommaret) modules and their syzygies, introducing the -resolution and a rich functorial viewpoint. It proves key minimality criteria, relating minimal -resolutions to componentwise linearity, and demonstrates how Betti numbers of marked-basis-generated modules are controlled by the underlying -resolution. It then constructs and analyzes functors that parameterize marked bases, their syzygies, and whole resolutions, showing representability and natural isomorphisms with the marked scheme , and provides explicit schemes and projections (including the second-factor projection) that connect coefficients of syzygies to those of marked bases. The work culminates in detailed examples and an application to Hilbert schemes, illustrating how marked schemes encode loci of componentwise linear ideals and their syzygy structures, with explicit parameter-elimination results via depth conditions.

Abstract

Let be a field and a Noetherian -algebra. In a paper of 2020, M. Albert, C. Bertone, M. Roggero and W. M. Seiler proved that, given a quasi-stable module with , any submodule generated by a marked basis over admits a special free resolution described in terms of marked bases as well, called the {\em -resolution of }. In this paper, we first investigate the minimality of the -resolution and its structure. When is an ideal and , we show that is componentwise linear if and only if its -resolution is minimal, up to a linear change of variables. Then, adopting a functorial approach to the construction of the -resolution, we prove that certain functors naturally associated with the resolution are isomorphic. These isomorphisms arise from the fact that the marked basis of the -th syzygy module in the -resolution can be expressed in terms of the coefficients of the marked basis of . Moreover, when is an ideal of depth at least 2, this correspondence can be reversed: in this case, the marked basis of itself can be written in terms of the coefficients of the marked basis of its first syzygy module.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 27 theorems, 85 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Proposition 2.7

ABRS With this notation, every element $f$ of $R_A^m (- \boldsymbol{d})$ can be uniquely written as with $g\in \langle \mathcal{N}(U)\rangle$, $f_{\underline{\gamma}, \ell} \in F$, $P_{\underline{\gamma},\ell} \in R_A$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Supp}}\nolimits(P_{\underline{\gamma},\ell}\cdot x^{\underline{\gamma}}) \subset \mathcal{C}(x^{\underline{\gamma}})$. In particular, if $F$ is a $U$-marked ba

Figures (1)

  • Figure A.1: Examples of $J$-marked bases defining points in the irreducible components of $\mathbf{Hilb}^{3t+2}(\mathbb{P}^3)$ with their $J$-resolutions. The computation of $J$-resolutions is available in the M2 ancillary file http://www.paololella.it/software/examples-curves-each-component.m2

Theorems & Definitions (72)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Example 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Proposition 2.7
  • Theorem 2.8
  • Proposition 2.9
  • proof
  • ...and 62 more