Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Asymptotic meshes from $r$-variational adaptation methods for static problems in one dimension

Darith Hun, Nicolas Moës, Heiner Olbermann

TL;DR

The paper develops a rigorous framework for mesh optimization in one-dimensional variational problems by embedding the mesh as a design variable in the energy functional. It proves that the renormalized discrete energies $\mathcal{F}_n$ $\Gamma$-converge to a limit functional $\mathcal{F}^*$, yielding an asymptotic description of optimal meshes through a balance between the second variation of the energy and a mesh-density term. The resulting limit problem identifies the asymptotically optimal mesh via a density proportional to $|f|^{2/3}$ in the Dirichlet-type example, and the authors provide numerical experiments showing close agreement between the asymptotic mesh and finite-element meshes obtained with large $n$. The framework offers a principled path to mesh optimization based on configurational equilibrium and suggests potential extensions to higher dimensions. Overall, the work connects $\Gamma$-convergence theory with practical adaptive meshing for nonlinear variational problems.

Abstract

We consider the minimization of integral functionals in one dimension and their approximation by $r$-adaptive finite elements. Including the grid of the FEM approximation as a variable in the minimization, we are able to show that the optimal grid configurations have a well-defined limit when the number of nodes in the grid is being sent to infinity. This is done by showing that the suitably renormalized energy functionals possess a limit in the sense of $Γ$-convergence. We provide numerical examples showing the closeness of the optimal asymptotic mesh obtained as a minimizer of the $Γ$-limit to the optimal finite meshes.

Asymptotic meshes from $r$-variational adaptation methods for static problems in one dimension

TL;DR

The paper develops a rigorous framework for mesh optimization in one-dimensional variational problems by embedding the mesh as a design variable in the energy functional. It proves that the renormalized discrete energies -converge to a limit functional , yielding an asymptotic description of optimal meshes through a balance between the second variation of the energy and a mesh-density term. The resulting limit problem identifies the asymptotically optimal mesh via a density proportional to in the Dirichlet-type example, and the authors provide numerical experiments showing close agreement between the asymptotic mesh and finite-element meshes obtained with large . The framework offers a principled path to mesh optimization based on configurational equilibrium and suggests potential extensions to higher dimensions. Overall, the work connects -convergence theory with practical adaptive meshing for nonlinear variational problems.

Abstract

We consider the minimization of integral functionals in one dimension and their approximation by -adaptive finite elements. Including the grid of the FEM approximation as a variable in the minimization, we are able to show that the optimal grid configurations have a well-defined limit when the number of nodes in the grid is being sent to infinity. This is done by showing that the suitably renormalized energy functionals possess a limit in the sense of -convergence. We provide numerical examples showing the closeness of the optimal asymptotic mesh obtained as a minimizer of the -limit to the optimal finite meshes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 4 theorems, 110 equations, 5 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.2

Let $\mathcal{L}:I\times \mathbb{R}^N\times\mathbb{R}^N\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy condition (A1).

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Optimal position of nodes for $f(x)=x^2$ and $f(x)=\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp( - \frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2})$, (with $\mu=0.5$ and $\sigma =0.05$). The dashed graph is the optimal piecewise affine function. For comparison, we display the exact solution $u_*$ (in color).
  • Figure 2: Relative error of the solution $u$ and $u'$ using an equal distributed mesh (black) with AMF (red), and descent gradient meshing method (blue).
  • Figure 3: Mesh distribution error between GD and AMF method for different f (left) quadratic and (right) gaussian ($\mu=0.5,\sigma=0.03$).
  • Figure 4: $L^1$-error between position of nodes obtained by GD and AMF method for different rational functions.
  • Figure 5: $L^1$-error between position of nodes obtained by GD and AMF method for Gaussian functions with different variances.

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • Remark 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:Fjgamma']} (o) and (i)
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['thm:Fjgamma']} (ii)
  • Lemma A.1
  • ...and 1 more