Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Inverting Integers in Tambara Functors

Ben Spitz

TL;DR

This work proves that inverting an integer $k$ in a $G$-Tambara functor $T$ yields a localization that is independent of the level at which the inversion is performed: $T[1/k_e]$ is canonically isomorphic to $T[1/k_G]$, and more generally $k$ is a unit at all levels iff it is a unit at any single level. The authors leverage the Burnside Tambara functor, the ghost map, and Dress’s prime-ideal description to establish the equivalence of unit conditions across $T(G/G)$, $T(G/H)$ for all $H\le G$, and $T(G/e)$, with a contradiction argument when assuming $k$ fails to be a unit in the relevant localization. The results unify and simplify localization arguments in equivariant algebra, align with related work on $G$-spectra localization and Tambara-localizations, and imply that norm constructions $N_H^G$ preserve localization by inverting $k$. Overall, the paper clarifies the intrinsic level-independence of integer localization in Tambara functors and provides groundwork for streamlined computations in equivariant algebraic contexts.

Abstract

Let $G$ be a finite group. A $G$-Tambara functor $T$ consists of collection of commutative rings $T(G/H)$ (one for each subgroup $H$ of $G$), together with certain structure maps, satisfying certain axioms. In this note, we show that, for any integer $k$, any $G$-Tambara functor $T$, and any subgroups $H_1, H_2 \leq G$, $k$ is a unit in $T(G/H_1)$ if and only if $k$ is a unit in $T(G/H_2)$.

Inverting Integers in Tambara Functors

TL;DR

This work proves that inverting an integer in a -Tambara functor yields a localization that is independent of the level at which the inversion is performed: is canonically isomorphic to , and more generally is a unit at all levels iff it is a unit at any single level. The authors leverage the Burnside Tambara functor, the ghost map, and Dress’s prime-ideal description to establish the equivalence of unit conditions across , for all , and , with a contradiction argument when assuming fails to be a unit in the relevant localization. The results unify and simplify localization arguments in equivariant algebra, align with related work on -spectra localization and Tambara-localizations, and imply that norm constructions preserve localization by inverting . Overall, the paper clarifies the intrinsic level-independence of integer localization in Tambara functors and provides groundwork for streamlined computations in equivariant algebraic contexts.

Abstract

Let be a finite group. A -Tambara functor consists of collection of commutative rings (one for each subgroup of ), together with certain structure maps, satisfying certain axioms. In this note, we show that, for any integer , any -Tambara functor , and any subgroups , is a unit in if and only if is a unit in .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 4 theorems, 12 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Let $\mathfrak{p}$ be a prime ideal of $A(G)$. Then there exists a subgroup $H \leq G$ and a prime ideal $\mathfrak{q} \in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}\nolimits \mathbb{Z}$ such that

Theorems & Definitions (6)

  • Proposition : Dress
  • Lemma
  • proof
  • Theorem
  • proof
  • Corollary