Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Femtosecond self-diffraction as a measure of the nonlinear response spectrum

Luca Assogna, Giovanna Salvitti, Matteo Silvestri, Federico Perrella, Riccardo Mincigrucci, Cristian Soncini, Elena Incerto, Armando Carlone, Majed Chergui, Claudio Masciovecchio, Paola Benassi, Andrea Marini, Davide Tedeschi, Carino Ferrante

Abstract

Self diffraction is a four-wave mixing process proportional to the square modulus of third-order nonlinearity susceptibility $χ^{(3)}$, which is related to the material's electronic and thermal properties. In this study, we investigate the wavelength dependence of the self-diffracted signal generated by a femtosecond pulsed laser in a dye solution to directly evaluate the electronic third-order nonlinear susceptibility spectrum. By accounting for absorption effects and phase matching conditions, we determine the $\vertχ^{(3)}\vert$ for different concentrations. Experimental results complemented with theoretical predictions, show that in the low absorption and thin sample limits, the signal reproduce the $\vertχ^{(3)}\vert$ spectral profile. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of measuring nonlinear susceptibility spectra arising solely from the bound-electronic response across a wide spectral range and for various compounds.

Femtosecond self-diffraction as a measure of the nonlinear response spectrum

Abstract

Self diffraction is a four-wave mixing process proportional to the square modulus of third-order nonlinearity susceptibility , which is related to the material's electronic and thermal properties. In this study, we investigate the wavelength dependence of the self-diffracted signal generated by a femtosecond pulsed laser in a dye solution to directly evaluate the electronic third-order nonlinear susceptibility spectrum. By accounting for absorption effects and phase matching conditions, we determine the for different concentrations. Experimental results complemented with theoretical predictions, show that in the low absorption and thin sample limits, the signal reproduce the spectral profile. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of measuring nonlinear susceptibility spectra arising solely from the bound-electronic response across a wide spectral range and for various compounds.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 equations, 3 figures.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: a) SD experimental setup scheme. Starting from the bottom, the fs pulse emitted by an OPA enters the optical path. A 50:50 plate beam splitter divides the pump into two equivalent beams, $1$ and $2$. Beams $1$ and $2$ are focused by a lens with focal length of $10\ {\rm cm}$ before reaching a $10\ \mu \rm m$ thick sample with angle of incidence $-\theta$ and $\theta$, respectively. Time-overlap is tuned by a delay line in beam $1$ path. The temporal chromatic dispersion on the two arms are balanced by a compensation plate. After the sample, a second lens with a focal length of $20\ {\rm cm}$ collimates the SD signal towards a CCD, whose typical example is shown in the colormap. The inset provides a visual representation of the SD process in our reference frame. b) Measured imaginary part of the linear susceptibility normalized by the molecular number density ${\rm Im}\chi^{(1)}(\lambda)/\mathcal{N}$ as a function of the wavelength for three molar concentrations (C) of Methyl Blue dye solutions dispersed in water.
  • Figure 2: a) Colored dots represent SD signals normalized by the peak intensity of the beams, acquired at steps of $2\ {\rm nm}$ for different C. Peak-to-valley dynamics are observed as C increases. The black lines are a fit to the data. b) Colored triangles represent ${\rm Im}\chi^{(1)}(\lambda)$ spectra acquired linear regime, rescaled by number density $\mathcal{N}$. Green lines are fit to the data, while the green dotted and dashed lines represent the two Lorentzian components of ${\rm Im}\chi^{(1)}(\lambda)$ convoluted with the Gaussian contribution reported in \ref{['fig1']}b). c) Colored squares show the $\vert\chi^{(3)}\vert$ spectra, which were retrieved by rescaling the SD intensities using \ref{['eq:main']}. The green lines show the sum of the two Gaussian-convoluted Lorentzian components of $\vert\chi^{(3)}\vert$, which are shown as the green dotted and dashed lines.
  • Figure 3: SD signal as a function of the wavelength normalized by the peak intensity measured for different impinging power, measured before the beam splitter in Figure \ref{['fig1']}a at fixed wavelength $\lambda = 640\rm \ {\rm nm}$. The error associated with the 0.5 mW-power measurement is reduced by a factor 3 for sake of clarity. Insert: integrated SD signal as a function of the impinging power. The blue line is a third-power reference curve.