STAR-Bench: Probing Deep Spatio-Temporal Reasoning as Audio 4D Intelligence
Zihan Liu, Zhikang Niu, Qiuyang Xiao, Zhisheng Zheng, Ruoqi Yuan, Yuhang Zang, Yuhang Cao, Xiaoyi Dong, Jianze Liang, Xie Chen, Leilei Sun, Dahua Lin, Jiaqi Wang
TL;DR
STAR-Bench defines audio 4D intelligence as deep spatio-temporal reasoning over sound dynamics and introduces a two-tier benchmark: Foundational Acoustic Perception for precise perceptual acuity, and Holistic Spatio-Temporal Reasoning for multi-source, temporally and spatially consistent inference. The data pipeline combines procedurally synthesized audio with real-world corpora, plus rigorous human annotation and validation to ensure high-quality questions. Evaluation across 19 models reveals a substantial gap to humans and highlights a capability split between closed- and open-source systems, with spatial reasoning being particularly challenging due to multi-channel processing requirements. The work provides actionable diagnostics and a clear path forward for developing models with robust, physically grounded auditory understanding applicable to embodied AI.
Abstract
Despite rapid progress in Multi-modal Large Language Models and Large Audio-Language Models, existing audio benchmarks largely test semantics that can be recovered from text captions, masking deficits in fine-grained perceptual reasoning. We formalize audio 4D intelligence that is defined as reasoning over sound dynamics in time and 3D space, and introduce STAR-Bench to measure it. STAR-Bench combines a Foundational Acoustic Perception setting (six attributes under absolute and relative regimes) with a Holistic Spatio-Temporal Reasoning setting that includes segment reordering for continuous and discrete processes and spatial tasks spanning static localization, multi-source relations, and dynamic trajectories. Our data curation pipeline uses two methods to ensure high-quality samples. For foundational tasks, we use procedurally synthesized and physics-simulated audio. For holistic data, we follow a four-stage process that includes human annotation and final selection based on human performance. Unlike prior benchmarks where caption-only answering reduces accuracy slightly, STAR-Bench induces far larger drops (-31.5\% temporal, -35.2\% spatial), evidencing its focus on linguistically hard-to-describe cues. Evaluating 19 models reveals substantial gaps compared with humans and a capability hierarchy: closed-source models are bottlenecked by fine-grained perception, while open-source models lag across perception, knowledge, and reasoning. Our STAR-Bench provides critical insights and a clear path forward for developing future models with a more robust understanding of the physical world.
