Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Adding cofinal countable sequences through multiple regular cardinals by ssp forcing

Ben De Bondt, Boban Velickovic

TL;DR

The article develops a direct stationary-set preserving forcing scheme to realize $\omega$-cofinal sequences for every regular cardinal in a fixed set $${\mathcal{K}}$, while keeping other uncountable regular cardinals with their cofinalities intact. The construction uses two layers of side-condition forcing built from Foreman–Magidor style games and a family of multiple Namba games, yielding forcings $\mathbb{P}_0^{\mathbf{Nm}}({\mathcal{K}})$ and $\mathbb{P}_1^{\mathbf{Nm}}({\mathcal{K}})$ that are strongly ssp and semiproper. The first forcing adds $\omega$-cofinal sequences through each $\kappa \in {\mathcal{K}}$, while the second forces the remaining regular cardinals in a regulated way so that their cofinalities become $\omega_1$; together they shape the global cofinality structure while preserving projective-stationary models. An application to the countable-cofinality-constructible model $C^*$ demonstrates coding of larger objects and preservation of stationarity in the constructible hierarchy, illustrating the practical impact of the method. The framework also provides a thorough semiproperness analysis, including the role of measurable cardinals in ensuring stronger preservation properties.

Abstract

We present a direct construction of stationary set preserving forcings that make $ω$-cofinal all the members of some arbitrary set $\mathcal{K}$ of regular cardinals $κ> ω_1$. In addition, it is made possible to ensure that no other uncountable regular cardinals from the ground model acquire countable cofinality in the forcing extension. Our method is elementary, being based on a combinatorial argument by Foreman and Magidor together with generalizations of typical side-condition arguments and needs no assumptions beyond $\mathsf{ZFC}$.

Adding cofinal countable sequences through multiple regular cardinals by ssp forcing

TL;DR

The article develops a direct stationary-set preserving forcing scheme to realize -cofinal sequences for every regular cardinal in a fixed set $, while keeping other uncountable regular cardinals with their cofinalities intact. The construction uses two layers of side-condition forcing built from Foreman–Magidor style games and a family of multiple Namba games, yielding forcings and that are strongly ssp and semiproper. The first forcing adds -cofinal sequences through each , while the second forces the remaining regular cardinals in a regulated way so that their cofinalities become ; together they shape the global cofinality structure while preserving projective-stationary models. An application to the countable-cofinality-constructible model demonstrates coding of larger objects and preservation of stationarity in the constructible hierarchy, illustrating the practical impact of the method. The framework also provides a thorough semiproperness analysis, including the role of measurable cardinals in ensuring stronger preservation properties.

Abstract

We present a direct construction of stationary set preserving forcings that make -cofinal all the members of some arbitrary set of regular cardinals . In addition, it is made possible to ensure that no other uncountable regular cardinals from the ground model acquire countable cofinality in the forcing extension. Our method is elementary, being based on a combinatorial argument by Foreman and Magidor together with generalizations of typical side-condition arguments and needs no assumptions beyond .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 18 theorems, 37 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.7

Fix a regular cardinal $\theta \gg \lambda$ together with a countable elementary $N_0\prec H_\theta$ with $\mathcal{K}\in N_0$. Let $\mathbf{T}$ be an acceptable subtree of an $N_0$-fully labelled tree $(\widetilde{\mathbf{T}},\ell)$, let $\kappa \in \mathcal{R}_\lambda$ be a branching cardinality f Then there are club many $\delta < \kappa$ such that ${\mathrm{PII}}$ has a winning strategy in the

Theorems & Definitions (41)

  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5: foreman-magidor
  • Definition 2.6
  • Lemma 2.7: Winning lemma, foreman-magidor
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.8: Thinning lemma, foreman-magidor
  • ...and 31 more