Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Semi-supervised and unsupervised learning for health indicator extraction from guided waves in aerospace composite structures

James Josep Perry, Pablo Garcia-Conde Ortiz, George Konstantinou, Cornelie Vergouwen, Edlyn Santha Kumaran, Morteza Moradi

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of extracting prognostic health indicators (HIs) for aerospace composite structures from guided waves, where true HI labels are unavailable. It introduces two learning paradigms—Diversity-DeepSAD (semi-supervised with continuous auxiliary labels) and a degradation-trend-constrained VAE (DTC-VAE, unsupervised with a monotonicity constraint)—coupled with multi-domain signal processing (FFT, STFT, EMD, HT) and per-frequency HI fusion via a weighted ensemble. FFT-based features combined with WAE fusion yield peak performance (approximately $F_{test}\approx 2.76$, or ~92%), while DTC-VAE provides the most consistent HIs across units (high $F_{all}$). Overall, the framework demonstrates robust HI construction with reduced overfitting compared to baselines, enabling more reliable remaining-useful-life predictions for aeronautical structures. Future work will extend the prognostic criteria in the loss and validate the approach on diverse datasets.

Abstract

Health indicators (HIs) are central to diagnosing and prognosing the condition of aerospace composite structures, enabling efficient maintenance and operational safety. However, extracting reliable HIs remains challenging due to variability in material properties, stochastic damage evolution, and diverse damage modes. Manufacturing defects (e.g., disbonds) and in-service incidents (e.g., bird strikes) further complicate this process. This study presents a comprehensive data-driven framework that learns HIs via two learning approaches integrated with multi-domain signal processing. Because ground-truth HIs are unavailable, a semi-supervised and an unsupervised approach are proposed: (i) a diversity deep semi-supervised anomaly detection (Diversity-DeepSAD) approach augmented with continuous auxiliary labels used as hypothetical damage proxies, which overcomes the limitation of prior binary labels that only distinguish healthy and failed states while neglecting intermediate degradation, and (ii) a degradation-trend-constrained variational autoencoder (DTC-VAE), in which the monotonicity criterion is embedded via an explicit trend constraint. Guided waves with multiple excitation frequencies are used to monitor single-stiffener composite structures under fatigue loading. Time, frequency, and time-frequency representations are explored, and per-frequency HIs are fused via unsupervised ensemble learning to mitigate frequency dependence and reduce variance. Using fast Fourier transform features, the augmented Diversity-DeepSAD model achieved 81.6% performance, while DTC-VAE delivered the most consistent HIs with 92.3% performance, outperforming existing baselines.

Semi-supervised and unsupervised learning for health indicator extraction from guided waves in aerospace composite structures

TL;DR

This work tackles the challenge of extracting prognostic health indicators (HIs) for aerospace composite structures from guided waves, where true HI labels are unavailable. It introduces two learning paradigms—Diversity-DeepSAD (semi-supervised with continuous auxiliary labels) and a degradation-trend-constrained VAE (DTC-VAE, unsupervised with a monotonicity constraint)—coupled with multi-domain signal processing (FFT, STFT, EMD, HT) and per-frequency HI fusion via a weighted ensemble. FFT-based features combined with WAE fusion yield peak performance (approximately , or ~92%), while DTC-VAE provides the most consistent HIs across units (high ). Overall, the framework demonstrates robust HI construction with reduced overfitting compared to baselines, enabling more reliable remaining-useful-life predictions for aeronautical structures. Future work will extend the prognostic criteria in the loss and validate the approach on diverse datasets.

Abstract

Health indicators (HIs) are central to diagnosing and prognosing the condition of aerospace composite structures, enabling efficient maintenance and operational safety. However, extracting reliable HIs remains challenging due to variability in material properties, stochastic damage evolution, and diverse damage modes. Manufacturing defects (e.g., disbonds) and in-service incidents (e.g., bird strikes) further complicate this process. This study presents a comprehensive data-driven framework that learns HIs via two learning approaches integrated with multi-domain signal processing. Because ground-truth HIs are unavailable, a semi-supervised and an unsupervised approach are proposed: (i) a diversity deep semi-supervised anomaly detection (Diversity-DeepSAD) approach augmented with continuous auxiliary labels used as hypothetical damage proxies, which overcomes the limitation of prior binary labels that only distinguish healthy and failed states while neglecting intermediate degradation, and (ii) a degradation-trend-constrained variational autoencoder (DTC-VAE), in which the monotonicity criterion is embedded via an explicit trend constraint. Guided waves with multiple excitation frequencies are used to monitor single-stiffener composite structures under fatigue loading. Time, frequency, and time-frequency representations are explored, and per-frequency HIs are fused via unsupervised ensemble learning to mitigate frequency dependence and reduce variance. Using fast Fourier transform features, the augmented Diversity-DeepSAD model achieved 81.6% performance, while DTC-VAE delivered the most consistent HIs with 92.3% performance, outperforming existing baselines.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 20 sections, 23 equations, 10 figures, 14 tables.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: Single T-stiffener CFRP panel under C-C fatigue loading monitored with PZT sensors (red circles).
  • Figure 2: Framework for HI generation and evaluation — Step 1: Data Pre-Processing, Step 2: Signal Processing, Step 3: Feature Representation, Step 4: Feature Fusion — with prognostic criteria (Mo, Pr, Tr).
  • Figure 3: Relationship between new auxiliary labels and embedding output expected for the proposed Diversity-DeepSAD.
  • Figure 4: Architecture of Diversity-DeepSAD. Dash-dotted lines indicate the pretraining autoencoder and dashed lines indicate the loss function.
  • Figure 5: Architecture of degradation-trend-constrained variational autoencoder (DTC-VAE).
  • ...and 5 more figures