Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Segal models for equivariant incomplete infinite loop spaces

Tjark Bantelmann

TL;DR

The paper develops equivariant incomplete infinite loop space machines by introducing Γ-spaces indexed by disk-like systems $\\mathcal{I}$ and compatible $G$-universes $U$, producing connective positive $\\Omega$-$G$-spectra. It unifies several equivariant Γ-space models (Gamma-G, Gamma_G-G, Gamma_I-G) and introduces two coherent notions of specialness adapted to incomplete data, along with transfer maps and comparison results. The main achievement is Theorem A, establishing an incomplete Segal machine $\\mathbb{S}^{G,U}_\mathcal{I}$ that converts $\\mathcal{I}$-special input into $\\Omega$-spectra, together with Theorem B, which constructs Segal $K$-theory spectra for $\\mathcal{I}$-normed permutative $G$-categories via an associated $\\Gamma_\mathcal{I}$-$G$-category. The framework clarifies how isotropy, transfers, and universe-completeness interact in the incomplete setting and provides a robust path to equivariant $K$-theory with normed structures, potentially guiding coefficient-system approaches for more general Mackey-functor phenomena. Overall, the work extends Segal-type infinite loop space machines to incomplete equivariant contexts, enabling new stable- and algebraic-structure constructions in equivariant homotopy theory.

Abstract

We model equivariant infinite loop spaces indexed on incomplete universes via suitable equivariant analogs of $Γ$-spaces. The choice of universe dictates a transfer system which in turn dictates the Segal condition on equivariant $Γ$-spaces. Equivariant $Γ$-spaces themselves come in different but equivalent guises interpolating between categories $Γ$ as defined by Segal and $Γ_G$ as defined by Shimakawa. The main application is the construction of Segal $K$-theory of normed permutative categories.

Segal models for equivariant incomplete infinite loop spaces

TL;DR

The paper develops equivariant incomplete infinite loop space machines by introducing Γ-spaces indexed by disk-like systems and compatible -universes , producing connective positive --spectra. It unifies several equivariant Γ-space models (Gamma-G, Gamma_G-G, Gamma_I-G) and introduces two coherent notions of specialness adapted to incomplete data, along with transfer maps and comparison results. The main achievement is Theorem A, establishing an incomplete Segal machine that converts -special input into -spectra, together with Theorem B, which constructs Segal -theory spectra for -normed permutative -categories via an associated --category. The framework clarifies how isotropy, transfers, and universe-completeness interact in the incomplete setting and provides a robust path to equivariant -theory with normed structures, potentially guiding coefficient-system approaches for more general Mackey-functor phenomena. Overall, the work extends Segal-type infinite loop space machines to incomplete equivariant contexts, enabling new stable- and algebraic-structure constructions in equivariant homotopy theory.

Abstract

We model equivariant infinite loop spaces indexed on incomplete universes via suitable equivariant analogs of -spaces. The choice of universe dictates a transfer system which in turn dictates the Segal condition on equivariant -spaces. Equivariant -spaces themselves come in different but equivalent guises interpolating between categories as defined by Segal and as defined by Shimakawa. The main application is the construction of Segal -theory of normed permutative categories.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 36 sections, 73 theorems, 170 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Let $\mathcal{I}$ be a disk-like indexing system and let $U$ be a compatible $G$-universe. Then there exists an equivariant incomplete Segal infinite loop $G$-space machine

Theorems & Definitions (238)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2: Theorem A
  • Theorem 1.3: Theorem B
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4: MMO25, Lemma 1.11
  • Theorem 2.5: MMO25, Theorem 1.12
  • Theorem 2.6: MMO25, Lemma 1.13
  • Remark 2.7
  • ...and 228 more