Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Unveiling the soft X-ray source population towards the inner Galactic disk with XMM-Newton

Tong Bao, Gabriele Ponti, Frank Haberl, Samaresh Mondal, Mark R. Morris, Kaya Mori, Shifra Mandel, Xiao-jie Xu

TL;DR

This work targets the nature of faint X-ray sources detected by eRASS1 toward the inner Galactic disk by leveraging deeper XMM-Newton observations and Gaia DR3 data. Using X-ray spectral analysis in $0.2$--$10\, ext{keV}$, Gaia astrometry, and cross-matches with the HamStar framework, the authors classify 158 eRASS1 sources within the XMM footprint, finding that ~74% are coronal sources, ~8% wind-powered massive stars, and ~18% accreting compact objects, with an empirical hardness-ratio cut $HR > -0.2$ helping to isolate non-coronal sources. Stacking the classified population and comparing to the GRXE suggests that about 6% of the GRXE flux in $0.5$--$2.0\, ext{keV}$ is resolved into point sources above the eRASS1 flux limit of ~$5\times10^{-14}\, ext{erg cm}^{-2} \, ext{s}^{-1}$, dominated in soft band by active stars and in hard band by X-ray binaries. The results demonstrate that the eRASS1 catalog toward the inner Galactic disk is primarily coronal yet retains a non-negligible compact-object population identifiable via X-ray color selection, informing the composition of the GRXE and guiding future population studies in crowded disk fields.

Abstract

Across the Galactic disk lies a diverse population of X-ray sources, with the fainter end remaining poorly understood due to past survey sensitivity limits. We aim to classify and characterize faint X-ray sources detected in the eROSITA All-Sky Survey (eRASS1) towards the inner Galactic disk ($350^\circ < l < 360^\circ$, $-1^\circ < b < 1^\circ$) using deeper XMM-Newton observations (typical exposure of $\sim 20\,\text{ks}$). We analyzed 189 eRASS1 sources, combining X-ray spectral fitting ($0.2$--$10\,\text{keV}$) with Gaia astrometric and photometric data for robust classification. Our results show that the eRASS1 catalog towards the Galactic disk is overwhelmingly dominated by coronal sources ($\sim 74\%$), primarily active stars and binaries, with $\sim 8\%$ being wind-powered massive stars and $\sim 18\%$ being accreting compact objects. We propose an empirical hardness-ratio cut ($\text{HR} > -0.2$) to efficiently isolate these non-coronal sources. By stacking the classified population and comparing with the Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission (GRXE), we estimate that $\sim 6\%$ of the GRXE flux in the $0.5$--$2.0\,\text{keV}$ band is resolved into point sources above the eRASS1 flux limit ($\sim 5\times 10^{-14}\,\text{erg}\,\text{cm}^{-2}\,\text{s}^{-1}$). This resolved soft-band emission is dominated by active stars, while hard-band flux originates primarily from X-ray binaries. We conclude that the eRASS1 catalog retains a non-negligible population of compact objects that can be effectively distinguished using X-ray color selection.

Unveiling the soft X-ray source population towards the inner Galactic disk with XMM-Newton

TL;DR

This work targets the nature of faint X-ray sources detected by eRASS1 toward the inner Galactic disk by leveraging deeper XMM-Newton observations and Gaia DR3 data. Using X-ray spectral analysis in --, Gaia astrometry, and cross-matches with the HamStar framework, the authors classify 158 eRASS1 sources within the XMM footprint, finding that ~74% are coronal sources, ~8% wind-powered massive stars, and ~18% accreting compact objects, with an empirical hardness-ratio cut helping to isolate non-coronal sources. Stacking the classified population and comparing to the GRXE suggests that about 6% of the GRXE flux in -- is resolved into point sources above the eRASS1 flux limit of ~, dominated in soft band by active stars and in hard band by X-ray binaries. The results demonstrate that the eRASS1 catalog toward the inner Galactic disk is primarily coronal yet retains a non-negligible compact-object population identifiable via X-ray color selection, informing the composition of the GRXE and guiding future population studies in crowded disk fields.

Abstract

Across the Galactic disk lies a diverse population of X-ray sources, with the fainter end remaining poorly understood due to past survey sensitivity limits. We aim to classify and characterize faint X-ray sources detected in the eROSITA All-Sky Survey (eRASS1) towards the inner Galactic disk (, ) using deeper XMM-Newton observations (typical exposure of ). We analyzed 189 eRASS1 sources, combining X-ray spectral fitting (--) with Gaia astrometric and photometric data for robust classification. Our results show that the eRASS1 catalog towards the Galactic disk is overwhelmingly dominated by coronal sources (), primarily active stars and binaries, with being wind-powered massive stars and being accreting compact objects. We propose an empirical hardness-ratio cut () to efficiently isolate these non-coronal sources. By stacking the classified population and comparing with the Galactic Ridge X-ray Emission (GRXE), we estimate that of the GRXE flux in the -- band is resolved into point sources above the eRASS1 flux limit (). This resolved soft-band emission is dominated by active stars, while hard-band flux originates primarily from X-ray binaries. We conclude that the eRASS1 catalog retains a non-negligible population of compact objects that can be effectively distinguished using X-ray color selection.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 2 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Positional uncertainty comparison of eRASS1 and XMM-Newton sources. This histogram shows the 1$\sigma$ positional uncertainties for sources in the eRASS1 (black) and XMM-Newton (green) catalogs.
  • Figure 2: Angular separation between eRASS1 and nearest XMM-Newton sources. The prominent bimodal distribution indicates a natural separation threshold at approximately $\sim$16.3, used to distinguish true associations from random alignments.
  • Figure 3: Cross-matching results between eRASS1 and XMM sources. Among 189 eRASS1 sources within the XMM-Newton footprint, 158 have reliable XMM counterparts. The remaining 31 are categorized as potentially extended sources, source confusion in crowded regions, transient candidates, or straylight contamination/Galactic center sources and thus are outside the XMM filtered catalog.
  • Figure 4: Angular separation distributions for eRASS1, XMM-Newton, and Gaia matched sources. Histograms (top and right panels) display eRASS1- Gaia and XMM- Gaia separations, respectively. Rayleigh fits (red dashed lines) yield characteristic uncertainties of $\sigma_{\rm sep}$ = 3.44 for eRASS1- Gaia pairs and $\sigma_{\rm sep}$ = 0.89 for XMM- Gaia pairs. Main panel: eRASS1- Gaia versus XMM- Gaia separation with the y=x equality shown as a black dashed line. "Good" Hamstar matches are blue dots. "Bad" Hamstar matches are red dots with their source indices. Sources without a Hamstar match are represented by dark gray dots and indices of vertical outliers (XMM- Gaia separations $>$ 4) are labeled in black.