Beyond the Failures: Rethinking Foundation Models in Pathology
Hamid R. Tizhoosh
TL;DR
Problem: foundation models underperform in histopathology due to misalignment with tissue complexity and clinical requirements. Approach: synthesize empirical weaknesses and theoretical limits to diagnose core causes, including dense-embedding constraints and catastrophic inheritance, and advocate domain-specific, multi-scale design. Contributions: a synthesis of empirical evidence across robustness, generalization, and efficiency, plus a proposed path forward toward tissue-aware representations and new evaluation standards. Significance: calls for redefining foundation concepts in medical AI to deliver clinically reliable, interpretable, and scalable pathology tools.
Abstract
Despite their successes in vision and language, foundation models have stumbled in pathology, revealing low accuracy, instability, and heavy computational demands. These shortcomings stem not from tuning problems but from deeper conceptual mismatches: dense embeddings cannot represent the combinatorial richness of tissue, and current architectures inherit flaws in self-supervision, patch design, and noise-fragile pretraining. Biological complexity and limited domain innovation further widen the gap. The evidence is clear-pathology requires models explicitly designed for biological images rather than adaptations of large-scale natural-image methods whose assumptions do not hold for tissue.
