Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Evaluating In Silico Creativity: An Expert Review of AI Chess Compositions

Vivek Veeriah, Federico Barbero, Marcus Chiam, Xidong Feng, Michael Dennis, Ryan Pachauri, Thomas Tumiel, Johan Obando-Ceron, Jiaxin Shi, Shaobo Hou, Satinder Singh, Nenad Tomašev, Tom Zahavy

TL;DR

This work presents an AI system designed to generate puzzles characterized by aesthetic appeal, novelty, counter-intuitive and unique solutions, and assesses the system's creativity to assess its creativity.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Generative AI has raised significant questions regarding its ability to produce creative and novel outputs. Our recent work investigates this question within the domain of chess puzzles and presents an AI system designed to generate puzzles characterized by aesthetic appeal, novelty, counter-intuitive and unique solutions. We briefly discuss our method below and refer the reader to the technical paper for more details. To assess our system's creativity, we presented a curated booklet of AI-generated puzzles to three world-renowned experts: International Master for chess compositions Amatzia Avni, Grandmaster Jonathan Levitt, and Grandmaster Matthew Sadler. All three are noted authors on chess aesthetics and the evolving role of computers in the game. They were asked to select their favorites and explain what made them appealing, considering qualities such as their creativity, level of challenge, or aesthetic design.

Evaluating In Silico Creativity: An Expert Review of AI Chess Compositions

TL;DR

This work presents an AI system designed to generate puzzles characterized by aesthetic appeal, novelty, counter-intuitive and unique solutions, and assesses the system's creativity to assess its creativity.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Generative AI has raised significant questions regarding its ability to produce creative and novel outputs. Our recent work investigates this question within the domain of chess puzzles and presents an AI system designed to generate puzzles characterized by aesthetic appeal, novelty, counter-intuitive and unique solutions. We briefly discuss our method below and refer the reader to the technical paper for more details. To assess our system's creativity, we presented a curated booklet of AI-generated puzzles to three world-renowned experts: International Master for chess compositions Amatzia Avni, Grandmaster Jonathan Levitt, and Grandmaster Matthew Sadler. All three are noted authors on chess aesthetics and the evolving role of computers in the game. They were asked to select their favorites and explain what made them appealing, considering qualities such as their creativity, level of challenge, or aesthetic design.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 10 figures.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: AI-generated puzzle with unanimous acclaim from the experts. https://lichess.org/analysis/1r1r2k1/Q2p1R1p/2p2R2/1p3pB1/1P4q1/8/5K2/8 w
  • Figure 1: (Left) After playing 1. Rg6+ where both Rooks are left unprotected. (Right) Continuing with 1...Kxf7 2. Qa1 hxg6 3. Qf6+ Kg8 4. Bh6! avoiding the tempting 4. Qxg6+, after which victory slips away. White is completely winning at the end of the variation.
  • Figure 2: (Left) Puzzle position https://lichess.org/analysis/1qb5/5k2/P1Qp1bNp/2pP1P2/2P1pP1P/8/3rB1R1/4K3 b. (Right) After playing 1... Bc3 2. Ne5+ Kf6 3. Rg6+ Kxf5 4. Qxc8+ Qxc8 5. Bg4+ Kxf4 6. Bxc8 Kxe5, which leads to a winning position for black.
  • Figure 3: (Left) Puzzle position https://lichess.org/analysis/rnbqrbk1/pp3Rp1/2p1p1N1/3p1P1Q/3PnB2/2P5/PP3P1P/6K1 w. (Right) Position after playing 1. Re7! Qxe7 2. Qh8+ Kf7 3. Ne5+ Kf6 4. Qh5!!. Continuing with 4... Qc7 5. Qxe8, white is winning.
  • Figure 4: (Left) Puzzle position https://lichess.org/analysis/r4b1k/pq1PN1pp/nn1Q4/2p3P1/2p4P/1Pp5/P7/2KR4 w. (Right) After under-promoting the pawn with 1. Qe6 Bxe7 2. d8=N!, white eventually gains an upper hand.
  • ...and 5 more figures